Microsoft sucks, but what exactly is the threat you’re trying to mitigate by not putting their Office suite on GH? Microsoft deciding to disappear it or take control of it one day? MS does a ton of business in Europe, so they have a lot more to risk than PR history for tools that the devs would all still have on their machines (and thus could migrate at any time to another code repo).
There’s not a readily-available European alternative to Github, and no, Codeberg is not one, because the value of GH is not just hosting code, it’s being a well-known place to find code. If you want a “European alternative” to GH, you’d first need to create an internationally-famous, known-by-all-developers platform. But that’s not “in scope” for their EU-Office tool.
There’s not a readily-available European alternative to Github, and no, Codeberg is not one, because the value of GH is not just hosting code, it’s being a well-known place to find code.
Codeberg is absolutely an alternative hosting place that is ready to go today. Medium and large players like Zig, Guix, Librewolf, Forgejo, and Comaps are on Codeberg. These aren’t random people with projects that no one uses. These are large projects with lots of collaborators that ship software to lots of people. (Even Alpine Linux seems to be experimenting with Codeberg.)
Codeberg has a similar UI/UX to GitHub. It’s got CI too, either traditional CI with Woodpecker, or you can migrate your GitHub Actions to Forgejo Actions (which are similar).
Codeberg is big and popular enough that it shows up in web search results, search for “zig source code” and you’ll get a result for Codeberg. It’s not like people only search for code in the GitHub search bar.
I wasn’t saying that codeberg was isolation, I’m saying that you don’t have to extract yourself from all non-European tools and dependencies in order to maintain sovereignty.
Codeberg is big and popular enough that it shows up in web search results
Not from what I can see.
search for “zig source code”
Sure, if you search for something you are explicitly aware is on Codeberg, you’ll find… links to Codeberg.
But if you search for “source code repositories”, “where to find open source software”, “where to find source code for software”, you get #1 Github, then Sourceforge, then other random ones like Google Code Repos.
Even from the projects you listed, I’ve only heard of Forgejo (and that’s only because I was explicitly searching for self-hosted code repo software), and Librewolf (Alpine is on their own Gitlab instance). Also, listing the software that the website itself is built on as evidence of big projects hosting there is a little obama-giving-himself-a-medal-meme-y.
I’m not saying Codeberg is bad, or that people shouldn’t use it, but it’s not well-known and is not something to shame people for not using.
I find code on codeberg all the time. Skill issue if you can’t.
Of course there’s no readily available european alternative to github, if you exclude the most obvious readily available european alternative to github.
You won’t find codeberg unless you search for it or a repo that lives on it explicitly.
Search in Google, DDG, Kagi, or whatever search engine you like for some generic variant of “where to find source code/ foss tools/ etc”, and show me the combo that returns you Codeberg.
Unlike Github, which is
a well-known place to find code
Codeberg is not, and most people have not heard of it, and won’t find it organically.
First result is the official website, second is github because they migrated very recently (links to codeberg) third is codeberg.
Yes, skill issue. You are complaining that you search for “where to find source code” and complaining that the vapid useless SEO-optimized articles that you find do not mention codeberg? Your search query sucks. Search for <tool> source code or similar instead.
Yeah but what they said is meaningless. Searching for <tool> source code is how you would search for tool’s source code. Not “where to find source code”
Is the code mirrored on GitHub?
If yes, you are right. It’s a skill issue of web searching
If no, you are wrong. It’s sort of like searching for a reddit community for lemmy by searching “AskLemmy lemmy.world”.
(The goal is to highlight that AskReddit was essentially forked to AskLemmy and made it’s own thing that is only on Lemmy)
You clearly haven’t read what I wrote. I wrote that the EU could have set up the repo on codeberg and a mirror on github for visibility. Instead they chose to host on github which is unjustifiable.
On top: Codeberg is like sourceforge: Relativeky unknown.
So some of the less technically inclined may know GitHub but would interpret Codeberg as a rip off unless IONOS literally links to it on their website (which they probably wont and instead just provide the download link or literally host the git infra on their own)
I don’t need to know that foot is hosted on codeberg. Searching for its source code reveals that it’s hosted there.
I do not need to know that euro office is hosted on github, searching for its source code reveals that it’s hosted there.
If you search on github itself that is your fault. If the goal is digital sovereignty for europe, hosting code on an american-owned forge when a perfectly viable european one exists is idiotic.
Whether you like the SEO-driving search engine providers or not, they are still the way that most people find things on the internet, and they prioritize Github results. When you’re not searching for “it”, but just searching them by describing things like it, (of which there are many, mostly on Github), it serves your interest to ‘O’ for the ‘SEs’ by putting it somewhere that will get prioritized higher.
If the goal is digital sovereignty for europe
Sovereignty is exercised and evidenced by a state’s ability to enforce the laws they have created. Microsoft operates within Europe. As long as Europe can enforce their laws upon Microsoft (as they can and do now), that relationship is still an exercise of European sovereignty.
Back to my first comment in the thread, “sovereignty != isolation”. Cutting yourself off from external groups does not make you “more sovereign” or something. If Europe cannot enforce their laws upon foreign business entities operating in their jurisdictions, and thus choose to prioritize Europe-headquartered businesses, that would be evidence of far weaker sovereign control of their jurisdiction.
Now, if it’s just a matter of prioritizing supporting European businesses, (call it, say, “Europe First”, or maybe “Make Europe Gr…” oh wait) that’s fine for them to do, and supporting any smaller business or organization over a large one is almost always preferable, but that isn’t and shouldn’t be about the perception of sovereignty or about nationalism, it should be about fighting back against corporate power by not rewarding these de facto monopolies and political meddlers and manipulators with your business.
But once again, that’s not within the scope (or ability) of a simple Office-alike application.
You’re saying that having your supply chain outside of your control strengthens your sovereignty, because apparently controlling it would be “evidence of far weaker sovereign control over their jurisdiction”.
Guess what, microslop operates within europe not just with github, but also with… Can you guess it? Yes, their office suite. And yet, the EU saw fit to develop an alternative to strengthen its digital sovereignty by removing a supply chain liability.
You are equating hosting on github with “isolation”, but that is complete bullshit.
First: there is no isolation whatsoever. Codeberg is fully searchable and indexable by search engines. It is an open and open source platform.
Second: the only way for a software forge to become more popular is for projects to use it. If the only problem with codeberg, in your mind, is that it’s not popular enough (and not other techincal or political issues), then not using it is not the solution. Indeed, a major european-backed project being hosted there would boost its popularity overnight.
Third: all of this is moot anyway, because if the only issue is popularity and visibility, the EU could have set up a github mirror of the codeberg repo instead. People searching on github would find the repo, search engines would bubble the result up, and the mirror would link to codeberg. Done.
The decision to host on github is completely unjustifiable when a perfectly valid european alternative exists.
I don’t see why the choice of host wouldn’t be “within the scope or ability” of an office application. Somebody (or rather, multiple somebodies) has decided to develop an alternative office suite branded as european, mainly for political reasons (I consider resilience against supply chain disruptions political reasons rather than technical in this context).
Therefore, it is clearly within the scope and ability of a “simple office-alike application” to “not reward these de facto monopolies and political meddlers”. It is evidenced by the fact that euro-office even exists. This extends to the choice of host.
And let me stress out that the only one talking about nationalism is you. Europe needs to disentangle itself the fuck away from american corporations because they are a liability and absolutely have the ability to make the entirety of europe crawl to a standstill if they wanted to, and that is a national security risk that has nothing to do with nationalism.
sovereignty != isolation
Microsoft sucks, but what exactly is the threat you’re trying to mitigate by not putting their Office suite on GH? Microsoft deciding to disappear it or take control of it one day? MS does a ton of business in Europe, so they have a lot more to risk than PR history for tools that the devs would all still have on their machines (and thus could migrate at any time to another code repo).
There’s not a readily-available European alternative to Github, and no, Codeberg is not one, because the value of GH is not just hosting code, it’s being a well-known place to find code. If you want a “European alternative” to GH, you’d first need to create an internationally-famous, known-by-all-developers platform. But that’s not “in scope” for their EU-Office tool.
Codeberg is absolutely an alternative hosting place that is ready to go today. Medium and large players like Zig, Guix, Librewolf, Forgejo, and Comaps are on Codeberg. These aren’t random people with projects that no one uses. These are large projects with lots of collaborators that ship software to lots of people. (Even Alpine Linux seems to be experimenting with Codeberg.)
Codeberg has a similar UI/UX to GitHub. It’s got CI too, either traditional CI with Woodpecker, or you can migrate your GitHub Actions to Forgejo Actions (which are similar).
Codeberg is big and popular enough that it shows up in web search results, search for “zig source code” and you’ll get a result for Codeberg. It’s not like people only search for code in the GitHub search bar.
I like the spirit but let’s be honest, none of the examples you cited in your first paragraph are “large”.
I wasn’t saying that codeberg was isolation, I’m saying that you don’t have to extract yourself from all non-European tools and dependencies in order to maintain sovereignty.
Not from what I can see.
Sure, if you search for something you are explicitly aware is on Codeberg, you’ll find… links to Codeberg.
But if you search for “source code repositories”, “where to find open source software”, “where to find source code for software”, you get #1 Github, then Sourceforge, then other random ones like Google Code Repos.
Even from the projects you listed, I’ve only heard of Forgejo (and that’s only because I was explicitly searching for self-hosted code repo software), and Librewolf (Alpine is on their own Gitlab instance). Also, listing the software that the website itself is built on as evidence of big projects hosting there is a little obama-giving-himself-a-medal-meme-y.
I’m not saying Codeberg is bad, or that people shouldn’t use it, but it’s not well-known and is not something to shame people for not using.
I find code on codeberg all the time. Skill issue if you can’t.
Of course there’s no readily available european alternative to github, if you exclude the most obvious readily available european alternative to github.
You won’t find codeberg unless you search for it or a repo that lives on it explicitly.
Search in Google, DDG, Kagi, or whatever search engine you like for some generic variant of “where to find source code/ foss tools/ etc”, and show me the combo that returns you Codeberg.
Unlike Github, which is
Codeberg is not, and most people have not heard of it, and won’t find it organically.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=foot+terminal+source
Very first result is codeberg
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=zig+lang+source
First result is the official website, second is github because they migrated very recently (links to codeberg) third is codeberg.
Yes, skill issue. You are complaining that you search for “where to find source code” and complaining that the vapid useless SEO-optimized articles that you find do not mention codeberg? Your search query sucks. Search for
<tool> source codeor similar instead.You’re not showing that they were wrong. You’re showing what they already said.
Yeah but what they said is meaningless. Searching for
<tool> source codeis how you would search for tool’s source code. Not “where to find source code”Is the code mirrored on GitHub?
If yes, you are right. It’s a skill issue of web searching
If no, you are wrong. It’s sort of like searching for a reddit community for lemmy by searching “AskLemmy lemmy.world”.
(The goal is to highlight that AskReddit was essentially forked to AskLemmy and made it’s own thing that is only on Lemmy)
You clearly haven’t read what I wrote. I wrote that the EU could have set up the repo on codeberg and a mirror on github for visibility. Instead they chose to host on github which is unjustifiable.
Skill issue indeed. Reading comprehension, specifically.
Let me spell it out:
“This year will be the year of
the Linux desktopCodeberg!”On top: Codeberg is like sourceforge: Relativeky unknown.
So some of the less technically inclined may know GitHub but would interpret Codeberg as a rip off unless IONOS literally links to it on their website (which they probably wont and instead just provide the download link or literally host the git infra on their own)
I don’t need to know that foot is hosted on codeberg. Searching for its source code reveals that it’s hosted there.
I do not need to know that euro office is hosted on github, searching for its source code reveals that it’s hosted there.
If you search on github itself that is your fault. If the goal is digital sovereignty for europe, hosting code on an american-owned forge when a perfectly viable european one exists is idiotic.
Whether you like the SEO-driving search engine providers or not, they are still the way that most people find things on the internet, and they prioritize Github results. When you’re not searching for “it”, but just searching them by describing things like it, (of which there are many, mostly on Github), it serves your interest to ‘O’ for the ‘SEs’ by putting it somewhere that will get prioritized higher.
Sovereignty is exercised and evidenced by a state’s ability to enforce the laws they have created. Microsoft operates within Europe. As long as Europe can enforce their laws upon Microsoft (as they can and do now), that relationship is still an exercise of European sovereignty.
Back to my first comment in the thread, “sovereignty != isolation”. Cutting yourself off from external groups does not make you “more sovereign” or something. If Europe cannot enforce their laws upon foreign business entities operating in their jurisdictions, and thus choose to prioritize Europe-headquartered businesses, that would be evidence of far weaker sovereign control of their jurisdiction.
Now, if it’s just a matter of prioritizing supporting European businesses, (call it, say, “Europe First”, or maybe “Make Europe Gr…” oh wait) that’s fine for them to do, and supporting any smaller business or organization over a large one is almost always preferable, but that isn’t and shouldn’t be about the perception of sovereignty or about nationalism, it should be about fighting back against corporate power by not rewarding these de facto monopolies and political meddlers and manipulators with your business.
But once again, that’s not within the scope (or ability) of a simple Office-alike application.
What an unhinged take.
You’re saying that having your supply chain outside of your control strengthens your sovereignty, because apparently controlling it would be “evidence of far weaker sovereign control over their jurisdiction”.
Guess what, microslop operates within europe not just with github, but also with… Can you guess it? Yes, their office suite. And yet, the EU saw fit to develop an alternative to strengthen its digital sovereignty by removing a supply chain liability.
You are equating hosting on github with “isolation”, but that is complete bullshit.
First: there is no isolation whatsoever. Codeberg is fully searchable and indexable by search engines. It is an open and open source platform.
Second: the only way for a software forge to become more popular is for projects to use it. If the only problem with codeberg, in your mind, is that it’s not popular enough (and not other techincal or political issues), then not using it is not the solution. Indeed, a major european-backed project being hosted there would boost its popularity overnight.
Third: all of this is moot anyway, because if the only issue is popularity and visibility, the EU could have set up a github mirror of the codeberg repo instead. People searching on github would find the repo, search engines would bubble the result up, and the mirror would link to codeberg. Done.
The decision to host on github is completely unjustifiable when a perfectly valid european alternative exists.
I don’t see why the choice of host wouldn’t be “within the scope or ability” of an office application. Somebody (or rather, multiple somebodies) has decided to develop an alternative office suite branded as european, mainly for political reasons (I consider resilience against supply chain disruptions political reasons rather than technical in this context).
Therefore, it is clearly within the scope and ability of a “simple office-alike application” to “not reward these de facto monopolies and political meddlers”. It is evidenced by the fact that euro-office even exists. This extends to the choice of host.
And let me stress out that the only one talking about nationalism is you. Europe needs to disentangle itself the fuck away from american corporations because they are a liability and absolutely have the ability to make the entirety of europe crawl to a standstill if they wanted to, and that is a national security risk that has nothing to do with nationalism.
Exactly, they are focusing on what they do well, and letting others do their part elsewhere.
Are we to criticize Euro-Office when they don’t drive European made cars too?