• Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      And? You’re allowed to say what you mean, you know.

      Where do the civilians being bombed fall on your spectrum of evil? Do they somehow deserve it in your eyes?

      • rastilin@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ok, I have to ask. How would you apply this to any other conflict. For example the Allies fighting against Germany. Where did the German civilians fall in the spectrum of evil. Was fighting Germany justified, knowing that German civilians might suffer? If so, how is this situation different?

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Strategic bombing - ie, the indiscriminate bombing of populated areas - was ineffective and immoral, and people at the time condemned it as such, and they were right to do so. It was also wrong to use Japanese cities as testbeds for nuclear arms. There was no real strategic reason to do it.

          So like… don’t do that? Maybe Israel shouldn’t do that, because fucking obviously?

          Like yes, there were bad states on the allied side in WWII as well. You can see that in how they conducted themselves after the war was over, and at many points before that. In fact the policies of the Nazis were directly inspired by US genocides.

          You’re not going to trip me up by bringing up the Nazis. I said states are the enemy of the people, and I meant it.

          None of what I said should be construed as support for the fascist axis powers, that should just be obvious, but I’m sure I have to say it, because people are just going to try it on.

          • rastilin@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            But you’re still ok with using artillery against a city if the city has an army in it?

              • rastilin@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                What? Why? Where did I say that? What the fuck are you talking about?

                I asked how this conflict was different and you started talking about a completely different topic like stategic bombing. But Israel isn’t using strategic bombing, they’re using artillery and missiles. Just like how the allies did against Berlin and other German cities when fighting the Germans. So how is this different?

                • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The difference is that Israel has been colonising the west bank for over 70 years. They are the aggressors. They are more analogous to the Nazis in WWII for that reason anyway.

                  And yes, just like there were bad actors on the allied side in WWII, Hamas is also a bad actor.

                  This isn’t… COMPLICATED.

                  • donuts@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    11
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    This isn’t… COMPLICATED.

                    Honestly that’s a pretty strange thing to say about one of history’s most complicated and oldest conflicts. If it was as simple as random dudes online think it is, don’t you think this issue would have been somehow resolved by now?

                    Both the Israelis and the Palestinians have tribal roots in the region dating back thousands of years.

                    The region also has religions significance to all three of the big western religions.

                    And to make it even more complicated, the region has been under the control of multiple empires over the last 3000 years: waring tribes, Egyptians, Assyrians, Romans, Byzantines, the second Muslim caliphate, the Ottomans, the British, and I’m sure I’m skipping more. Israel and Palestine as nations where effectively created at around the same time post WW1 (see the Mandate for Palestine and the Balfour Declaration).

                    So sure… It’s possible that you’re so much smarter than everyone else that one of the world’s oldest conflicts is trivial to you, OR, just maybe it’s a little bit more complicated than you and some other people let on…

                  • rastilin@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Israel pulled out of Palestine in 2005 and Palestine elected their own government, at that point they’re an independent nation.

    • Limitless_screaming@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Attacking civilians to stop an apartheid from getting more money and support is evil.

      Making up reasons after you target civilians and journalists is another level of evil.