Deykun@kbin.social to Science@kbin.social · edit-22 years agoAcademic journal forced to retract peer-reviewed AI-generated paper after "rat penis" pics go viralmedia.kbin.socialimagemessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down10
arrow-up19arrow-down1imageAcademic journal forced to retract peer-reviewed AI-generated paper after "rat penis" pics go viralmedia.kbin.socialDeykun@kbin.social to Science@kbin.social · edit-22 years agomessage-square14fedilink
minus-squarebedrooms@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoActually, figures should be checked during the reviewing process. It’s not an excuse.
minus-squarebedrooms@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoNo, “should be” as in, it must be reviewed but can be skipped if there’s a concern like revealing the author identity in a double-blind process.
deleted by creator
Actually, figures should be checked during the reviewing process. It’s not an excuse.
deleted by creator
No, “should be” as in, it must be reviewed but can be skipped if there’s a concern like revealing the author identity in a double-blind process.