• FaceDeer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s the “peer-reviewed” part that should be raising eyebrows, not the AI-generated part. How the gibberish images were generated is secondary to the fact that the peer reviewers just waved the obvious nonsense through without even the most cursory inspection.

    • Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      In another article, it said that one of the reviewers did being up the nonsense images, but he was just completely ignored. Which is an equally big problem.

    • oyfrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve heard some of my more senior colleagues call frontiers a scam even before this regarding editorial practices there.

      It’s actually furstratingly common for some reviewer comments to be completely ignored, so it’s possible someone raised a flag and no one did anything about it.

      • bedrooms@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        The biggest problem with Frontiers for me is that there are some handy survey articles that are cited like 500 times. It seems that Interdisciplinary surveys are hard to publish in a traditional journal, and as a result 500 articles cited this handy overview article for readers who would need an overview.

        The article I checked was in a reasonable quality, and it’s a shame I can’t cite it just because it’s in Frontiers.

      • Jesusaurus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Frontiers has something like a 90%+ publish rate, which for any “per reviewed” journal is ridiculously high. They have also been in previous scandals where a large portion of their editorial staff were sacked (no pun intended).

  • Froyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I enjoy reading between the lines. “Had the rat penis not gone viral, the paper would not have been retracted”

  • EmptyRadar@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    We’re in that interim period where people don’t understand the technology at all but still think it’s capable of anything, so even people who absolutely should know better are going to be misusing it.