• dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    Noble cause but they already spent 8 billion 2 years ago and there is plenty of hunger. I’m not sure how another 1.7 billion will fix it.

    There is plenty of food but the distribution is a big part of the problem, hopefully they are addressing that.

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I mean, his admin is ALSO currently trying to block the Kroger/Albertsons merger, for example. So this is clearly not the only thing going on.

        • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          9 months ago

          The FTC price increases in foods due to monopolizing is absolutely having a hand in helping to reduce hunger.

          Another thing I can think of off the top of my head the Biden admin and democrats are doing is fighting to increase funding for SNAP and resisting republican efforts to impose more restrictions on the program and make it harder to use.

          Also the 8 billion isn’t already spent and nothing happened, it’s in the process of being spent and this is more being put on top.

          While these are all fine and good, personally I still think a universal basic income would be the best way at reducing hunger. A totally unrestricted program like that though be very hard to push, despite all the evidence of their effectiveness, when there’s fighting over whether or not SNAP should be taking a fine toothed comb to exactly what foods people are or not allowed to buy with it.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            While these are all fine and good, personally I still think a universal basic income would be the best way at reducing hunger. A totally unrestricted program like that though be very hard to push, despite all the evidence of their effectiveness, when there’s fighting over whether or not SNAP should be taking a fine toothed comb to exactly what foods people are or not allowed to buy with it.

            Conservatives won’t be satisfied until the entire budget for any safety net program is consumed in administrative costs, leaving nothing for the actual people it’s supposed to be helping.

    • Pipoca@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The government spends hundreds of billions on infrastructure every year.

      Have we fixed potholes permanently?

      Also, $8 billion is a bit less than $24 bucks per person in America. Do you really think $24 is enough to permanently solve hunger in a country? Do you think that another $5/person is reasonable, a few years later?