“It seems likely that the damage to Russia’s productive capacity from the loss of western technology and key supplies will increase over time,” writes independent economist Roger Bootle.

“Moreover, the medium-term outlook for its supply capacity has been severely dented by the loss of so many soldiers in the Ukraine war – and more importantly, by the exodus of so many well-qualified young people who wished to escape both the Putin regime and the prospect of call-up.”

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        This will be a very tough pill for Russia to swallow. Traditionally Russia was the country with the industrial capacity, know how and wealth of the 2. Now the roles are reversed on all counts.

    • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Pick clean the carcass maybe. But I cannot imagine anyone interested in re-creating a strong Russia. The only worry will be who gets to keep what nukes. Cause there are bound to be so e entrepreneurial types that will see an opportunity to make a few dollar.

      • eran_morad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        CIA would get involved. A few billion dollars probably buys a lot of loose nukes. Non-state actors couldn’t deploy them, anyway.

      • Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        The nukes is the only thing they have left to bargain with, so russia split up or not, their nuclear arsenal (today and future) will have to go. They won’t be able to maintain them if they don’t give them up or they have be like bargaining with Iran and North Korea.

        So a split up and a " reverse Minsk Agreement " seems fitting.