☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoChina's representative points out at the ICJ that armed resistance against occupation is enshrined in international law and is not terrorism.media.mas.tovideomessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1videoChina's representative points out at the ICJ that armed resistance against occupation is enshrined in international law and is not terrorism.media.mas.to☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square15fedilinkfile-text
Your browser does not support playing HTML5 video. You can download a copy of the video file instead.
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoyou mean this Tibet? https://www.historicly.net/p/tibet-china-and-the-violent-reaction
minus-squareacargitz@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoIf being reactionary meant relinquishing the right to national self determination, the Israelis would be justified in opposing a free Palestine on the basis of Hamas being salafist shits. But they are not because it does not.
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoIf you can’t understand the sheer absurdity of your comment, there’s really no helping you.
you mean this Tibet? https://www.historicly.net/p/tibet-china-and-the-violent-reaction
If being reactionary meant relinquishing the right to national self determination, the Israelis would be justified in opposing a free Palestine on the basis of Hamas being salafist shits. But they are not because it does not.
If you can’t understand the sheer absurdity of your comment, there’s really no helping you.