• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I have to admit I’m kind of with the conservatives on this. I mean, of course it’s an issues and humanitarian crisis and yet one more example why climate change is so important but ……

    There’s already too much hyperbole here that makes me immediately want to discount this. Yeah, 20,000 is a lot of people to be affected but when you’re phrasing this as “entire cities” and “the capital city of the territory”, but the entire territory has fewer people than my “small suburb” ….

    Edit to add: my university had a larger population than this “entire cities”. Can’t we talk about this serious issue without counter-productive hyperbole?

    • raptir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t even know what to say to this. It’s not hyperbole, it is the entire population of the capitol city. I’m sorry that 20,000 is under the threshold for caring.