I may or not have implied a bit of that, yes.

It was kind of uncomfortable as the medal is hung from the neck…

You really see don’t see any guns being used against ICE at the moment.

That itself is enough to underscore the power differential between the state and the civilians, even in a country with legal gun ownership.

I’d really like everybody who is into guns, to be into guys instead. The world would be a better place.

This is the way

Good news, everyone!

I was pretty sure you had redeemable qualities, I was joking too, as I was pretty sure you weren’t actually Jordan Peterson ;)

I’m not sure. You are the one confused about you being Jordan Peterson or not.

I guess that the question boils down to to having redeemable qualities. At least using your own definition.

If you have them then you aren’t Jordan Peterson, of you don’t than I have bad news.

Quite a read. The attorney general acting as attorney for the president.

I have some tulips to sell to this guy

I had seen memes of his face being small in relation to his head, but I had no idea of his ramblings. His name wasn’t familiar to me before he met his end. I would not have minded never to have known him at all.

They literally own the means of production

I mean several people have argued this.

I remain of the opinion that there is -technically- a way to make this work. The problem of implementation is maybe a human flaw, but we’ve seen in history that there can be ways to change things.

200 years ago three were few democracies, for instance.

The fundamental problem with the law is that she should be blind to the person being judged, this technology can offer that.

I’m quite sure most people arguing that implementation would be difficult, but that’s not due to technical circumstance.

And it’s more the technical aspect that interests me, not the ‘will never happen’ side. It’s a thought experiment.

I mean it is clear that it’s an aggregator

Did you mean aggrrrregator?

I mean I’d prefer people not being idiots. But yeah

Playing the devil’s advocate:

If implemented correctly, an LLM has an advantage as it can only van do literal implementation of the law, and pre existent legislature and is essentially blind to who people are.

So it can be a blind and incorruptible judge.

However will it remain so?

It’s not good at all. Bunch of insecure, power tripping, drugged up mental teenagers running a country is never good, no matter how you call it.

The guy must main spy in TF2. That was a pro backstab maneuver

I like it that people from America have so much difficulty descerning ‘ie’ and ‘ei’ that op just used both.

See also Einstein ( ‘ain’ correct) Weinstein ( ‘steen’ <- only if it were written ‘stien’)

I was in Leipzig, the museum I was mainly taking about was museum der runde ecke but this museum Was also very informative