Epstein was an equal opportunity scumbag. This is already well known. He donated to both sides, and had clients from both sides. And all of them should go down no matter what party they are from.

Read the list of dems. Someone who clearly is biased against dems did the work of looking that all up to support their biased opinion. But that doesn’t mean the data is wrong. Their conclusions from it are not the same as the data.

You can fact check the relevant parts and skip the rest. Or you can pretend that just because some of the information in their is clearly biased, and the intent of the poster is clearly biased, that all of the information is wrong. Kinda sounds like the average fox news viewer claiming fake news at anything coming from a left leaning source.

Democrats and Republicans are really the same underneath. The mental illness that drives both to seek power and influence is the core of why they choose that profession. That same mental illness is what drives the type of pedophilia they commonly have. Democrats have learned to be more discreet because it will affect their success more. Republicans have learned the opposite. It probably even helps Republicans success in some cases.

Totally came to say that. I rinse but don’t use soap in some circumstances.

Sadly, it isn’t wrong. I’m pretty solidly anti-politician. We need better people making important decisions. https://groups.google.com/g/can.politics/c/6iODV2wYtE0?pli=1

Both sides are https://groups.google.com/g/can.politics/c/6iODV2wYtE0?pli=1 And both should be punished. I used “punished” because my real opinion is probably against some rule.

And wait, who would I be shilling for? I said nothing positive about anyone.

Dumb is assuming that because one side is really bad, that the other side is angels.
https://groups.google.com/g/can.politics/c/6iODV2wYtE0?pli=1

While your statement is popular, my response was to a bet that the subject of this post was a republican because he is inappropriate with minors.
My response to trump in general would probably get me banned.

He didn’t need to know. It’s a knee-jerk politician reaction to not release ingo if it may hurt anyone in thier party… or the oligarchy.

Hm. You wanna fact check that? https://groups.google.com/g/can.politics/c/6iODV2wYtE0?pli=1

Side note… I did watch the vid. She was pretty and all. But she was dressed far more conservatively than most high school girls. Certainly not dressed to look hot. So if he can’t keep his mind off the underage girl dressed conservatively, what would happen if he saw a bare midriff…

Really either one honestly. The dems are just better at hiding it.

As a voter, I have found that there is a significant lacking of useful information to make a decision on. I put in a fair bit of effort and often feel like I have nowhere near enough. And that is how the politicians want it. That way the majority of voters to have very little information of substance to go on. That way they can win on charisma. And they don’t have to do anything positive for the voters to move up. They just have to please the political powers in the area to get endorsements, campaign help, and straight up donations so they can move to the next level. But when it comes to school boards. Most won’t move to the next level. But they take advantage of the way the system is set up to get elected. They probably even believe that their opinions are the will of the voter, when the voter barely knows anything about their real opinions.

So your general point is a concern. Who can you trust to make the judgement. But that doesn’t mean you should just toss up your hands either. As was pointed out, tests of various sorts could be done and the results presented to the voters so that they have more to go on than the number of lawn signd they have seen for a person. The write ups in the guides are nearly pointless. They can say anything they want in there. For a person running for reelection, their voting record would be nice to give voters easy access to. There are lots of ways to present the voters with objective information so that they can choose based on thier preferences. But none of that happens today.

Thats what you get when you choose your leaders by popularity contest. That wouldn’t be appropriate even if she was an adult.

Look back at your own comment history, then look at the comment with all the drama. It stands out a lot. Normally you are level and making logical points, but in the one with ridiculous and such, you aren’t.

Can’t seem to find that book available on libby, so will have to do some extra digging. My info comes from mainly articles, not books. So I will take a look, as sometimes articles can misrepresent the people they are quoting or the work those experts have done. But usually that is done to sensationalize things. Not much of that happening in the area of ancient societies.

You are very confident about things that are easy to prove wrong.

Hierarchical societies have been around a long time. A very large variety of animals today have hierarchical concepts in their socialization. So you can use your inflamatory statements to try and hide how little basis the things you say have in facts. But it doesn’t make them any less false.

The more "I’m sorry"s, “ridiculous”, “bullshit quack…”, and association of the opposing view with racists and such you do. The more obvious you have no real logical arguments. Just like the people who talk louder to get noticed because they have nothing to say that people are interested in.

The general idea of school is to learn how to learn. Most of the core subjects are just the tip of their iceberg.
Take the older software devs who didn’t have computers in school when they went. They technically use almost nothing they actually studied in school. So you don’t really want to requie an overload on any given subject. Schools are even dialing back the math requirements. Like pre-calc. Not everyone needs that. The required algebra is more about problem solving than equations now. Which is good. Let the kids follow thier interests a little more.