The USS Gerald R. Ford has been at sea since June last year. The Republican leader’s decision to extend its deployment for a second time has snowballed into a growing list of problems, such as blocked toilets and sewage troubles.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 hours ago

    A sailor on board told the Journal that the crew members are angry and upset and wish to leave the Navy as soon as the deployment ends.

    A competent president takes this into account and doesn’t run their people into the ground needlessly.

    • Rimu@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s weird because USA has 11 aircraft carriers, easily enough to rotate their usage.

  • dan1101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 hours ago

    “An army marches on its stomach”, meaning the troops need a steady supply of food.

    I think that also means “An army marches on its butthole”, because the waste gotta go somewhere.

    • ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      As is the US isn’t figuratively shitting on the world, now they’re doing it literally.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        Man, I wish it were one-sided.

        If Joe Biden had his way we’d still be in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Syria, Somalia, Yemen, and Libya. (The 7 countries where Obama was making war at the end of his presidency all at the same time.)

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Whataboutism is awesome.

          ‘in’ is doing some very different lifting from case to case. America is ‘in’ the local airport, and they haven’t invaded yet. Our own troops will be ‘in’ Haiti or their own back yards, but there for support as a unified force and not just to go armed.

          ‘Making war’ is going a lot of heavy lifting here too.

          I worry you’re making points out of very little, but I don’t need to debate that.

          • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            Yes, following through on a withdrawal negotiated by the Donald Administration.

            But it probably did infuriate Donald supporters, just like how Dems supported the genocide in Gaza until the presidency changed hands and it was no longer convenient. Partisans have no real political convictions. It’s all a matter of convenience or just repeating whatever their algorithm tells them to think on a given day.