If I understand correctly, nextcloud automatically updated … which I didn’t think it would, normally. Maybe it’s a “feature” of the AIO docker image?

Never upgrade to the latest and greatest of … anything really, especially in production. Let others test it first, or as suggested already, have a staging environment where you test the upgrade first. I guess you can still downgrade nextcloud though, especially if you have a backup.

Are you using the AIO image? I don’t know how well that works, but yeah, I absolutely hate automatic updates like that. I tried it once and I decided to use the plain “official but not supported” docker image instead, where I manage things myself. Never had an issue, and I can control which version I’m running, I can backup to wherever I want, using whichever system I want, etc.

If you want people to take you seriously about being open source, you need to have a git repo, like github, gitlab, etc. you can even self host one. Heck, you can even use a different (non git) DVCS, but not just a link to a cloud drive…

That’s possible, I’m using Firefox, is that something firefox would do?

The site does use https for me… it instantly redirects from http to https

My point is, since its meaning depends on the context, I don’t see the issue for it to mean, in the context of containers, “outside of a container”. Just like in the case of VMs, or OS vs No OS, it means there’s one fewer layer between the app and the hardware, whether that’s a VM, Container runtime, or the OS.

I’m pretty sure everybody, including you, understood its meaning in this context, it didn’t really cause any misunderstanding.

That’s only the meaning you’re used to, and that’s my point. It depends on the context. I can assure you that, in the context of microcontrollers, for example, “bare metal” means running without an OS.

Well, since we want to be technical … Docker is not bare metal. Linux apps are not bare metal. Arduino is bare metal.

I still run it on a 10 year old chromebox (replacing chrome with linux of course). It’s really not that heavy. If it seems very slow, I’d try rebuilding the database from a dump (if mysql/mariadb), and making sure the db is on a fast drive. At least, those two things made a huge difference for me. Also, some people reported huge speedups switching to postgres.

It’s a different article, this one from cnn, the one you linked from nytimes. Yes, they are about the same story, but it’s not a duplicate.

I don’t claim to know what happened, but China’s super secretive behavior on it at the beginning, as well as being super controlling when the WHO delegation went to investigate, are enough reasons for me to strongly suspect it. No, I don’t have evidence, and I’m not following the scientific method, and there can be other explanations, but humans are humans.

More like xenophobia, really. If you’re a black tourist from the USA ready to spend money, they’ll love you.

For people downvoting (or upvoting, or anyone really), please make sure you read the article and not just the headline, which, as usual, is a bit misleading.

Back in my days “antisemitic” meant hating all jews, not merely opposing Israel’s government. So no, he’s not antisemitic.

Well, this one takes it one lever higher: calling an Israeli jew, descendent of holocaust survivors, “antisemite” just because he disagrees with the actions of his government …

They said the “most transparent” genocide, not the most brutal, or the quickest one, or the one with the most people killed.

the mainstream media continue to limit criticism of Israel to humanitarian issues arising from its conduct of the “war,” paying virtually no attention to the near unanimous ICJ rulings, and to the dehumanization of Palestinians by the language and tactics relied upon by Israel. Without using the word “genocide,” they reconfirm in word and deed the genocidal character of the assaults on Gaza

I think what they mean by “mosy transparent” is that it’s the most widely reported by the media, as well as downplayed as it happens.

Why is this post downvoted? It doesn’t matter which side you agree with, it is newsworthy.

The profit is for society as a whole for creating less waste, but of course, that doesn’t translate to money earned today. It will, on the other hand, translate to money lost (and more) in the future.

They did work, to a point, but were also pretty hurtful to US economy. The company I worked for, which shall not be named, decided to move a sizable chunk of product manufacturing to Malaysia, and is (was?) considering Mexico as well, all because of the tariffs. This caused the stock to tank, and money was lost, but then, it proved pretty handy when covid hit.

I don’t like Trump, and I didn’t like the way tariffs were implemented, but I strongly agree the US needs to be less dependent on China. Tariff did the job somewhat, so I guess it wasn’t a completely wrong decision.

Hmm not sure what you’re referring exactly in that article… maybe this (serious question)?

Just a few weeks ago, he said that he must remain in power. Why? In order to prevent a Palestinian state. Only he, so he said, can do that.

So this became his main electoral campaign slogan: I will prevent a Palestinian state.