I’ve already seen hivemind votes on some Lemmy comment threads. It’s just inevitable. Hopefully most Lemmy communities can be better about the banning thing though.
I’ve already seen hivemind votes on some Lemmy comment threads. It’s just inevitable. Hopefully most Lemmy communities can be better about the banning thing though.
Yeah, I’ve been following OP closely for a while - their posts always make my day better, I couldn’t do without them. I only wish I knew more.
This post is a good mildly infuriating post. The pizza does cost too much.
However, it also seems like the poster wasn’t ready for discussion when posting to a discussion board.
Nah you had it right. They mixed up left and right.
I have a plastic screen in front of my phone screen so I read the plastic and not the agreement.
There are plenty of good Lemmy communities that aren’t on those instances. I don’t blanket block them personally, but I understand those who do.
Ah, so it’s from below then
If it’s a housing market crash then the sooner the better
It’s git terminology which boils down to that anyone can contribute to the source code if the community approves the changes made.
Well you can feed more people with one cow’s life than one dog’s life.
Not that it’s right that either should have to be sacrificed anymore.
The truth is not a weird hill.
We have the technology!
pihole and an always-on syncthing node.
There’s a lot to unpack here
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jun/29/chinese-spy-balloon-shot-information-biden
This article further quotes that Pentagon spokesperson, who specified that the balloon did not send data back to China due to mitigation efforts that the US took.
Additionally, https://www.wsj.com/articles/chinese-balloon-used-american-tech-to-spy-on-americans-2e3f5039 having off the shelf parts does not necessarily mean it was a regular weather balloon. It took photos and videos, potentially of some of the secure areas it just happened to fly over. Note that while this article claims it used US gear, the included Pentagon quotes don’t back that claim up, instead saying past balloons used off the shelf US equipment.
I have no clue what you’re trying to say in your text, but other countries (namely Canada) did also spot Chinese balloons above their territory. There was also evidence that these balloons had equipment on board that did not line up with what is expected on a weather balloon.
For the record, they still claim that they do not sell user information nor data.