• ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Republicans are good buddies with Putin. If Trump would have been in power, he would have been selling weapons for the Russians, then play along with the whole “Ukrainians are actually Russians” stuff of Putin.

        • xerazal@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Comparing the two, trump is more dictator-aligned seeing as how he openly talks the dictator talk, aka using government agencies to take out political opponents, dehumanizing minorities to curry favor with fascists, openly calling for the constitution of the US to be ripped to shreds, etc. And let’s be honest here, whether trump or Biden, they’d both be enabling the genocide of Palestinians. The only difference is that while Biden is enabling the genocide of Palestinians, trump would do that and stop aid to Ukraine, letting Russia genocide tf outta Ukraine as well.

          Unfortunately Biden is the lesser of two evils…

  • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    nice job america, now in addition to everything else, you’ve lost a war you weren’t even fighting in. Fuck yeah!

    • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Are you implying Ukraine has lost the war? That’s just not true, they still hold territory that according to Putin is part of Russia

          • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yes, “you have lost” is present perfect and describes that the loss occurred at some unspecified point in time before. It can also describe a loss which effects can still be felt in the present.

            The implication is that OP is convinced that Ukraine has no chance of holding their lines, as you correctly pointed out earlier.

  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Can’t wait until this shit is over so that all the shit-for-brains boomers finally take down all their stupid flags.

  • Yor [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Without the support of Congress, it will be “difficult” for Ukraine to win, “even to stay,” Zelenskyy said in a video meeting with fundraising supporters, including Mark Hamill and billionaire Richard Branson.

    Nightmare blunt rotation

    Anyway, wow! You mean every time Russia was said to be slowing down or taking unsustainable levels of casualties wasn’t entirely true? Wow! surprised-pika

    • 420stalin69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think the weakness of Ukraine is also narrative.

      Whatever narrative they push, it’s completely unrelated to the truth.

      When they wanted western sympathy and when the western funds were rolling, it was the plucky tractor brigade killing Russians at $1.40 a kill.

      Now that they aren’t getting another aid package, the front lines are about to collapse and Russia will be in Warsaw by summer.

      It’s all bullshit. As in it’s unrelated to the truth. The truth has no relationship to what Zelenskyy says.

      The fact Ukraine is starting to push an imminent collapse narrative is a key factor in me believing collapse is not in fact imminent.

      • dragonfly4933@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        You are right, you can’t use only information Ukraine or Russia provides. But it probably is the case that Ukraine was stomping Russia for pennies on the dollar earlier in the war. However, Russia is not a static force. They learn and change their tactics, and Russia spends more resources now than they did earlier.

        It would be a grave mistake to stop aid to Ukraine while they are still willing and able to fight.

        • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          It would be a grave mistake to stop aid to Ukraine while they are still willing and able to fight.

          While who is still willing to fight? The conscripted who are forced to fight or the neonazis who volunteered to fight?

        • 420stalin69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          But it probably is the case that Ukraine was stomping Russia for pennies on the dollar earlier in the war.

          When the aid was flowing the narrative was that this was a “good investment” which is why they sold you with this “pennies on the dollar” angle.

          Put down the slava pipe and have a look at what the cost basis is for western military gear vs Russian stuff. It’s rarely better than 5:1 even for basic stuff like shells and advanced stuff runs at around 10:1. The idea that it was “pennies on the dollar” is crazy shit.

          It’s all narrative. It doesn’t have a relationship to facts on the ground. It’s a sales pitch.

          • spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            “Pennies on the dollar” refers more to the fact that we have mostly sent old equipment that’s already paid for and would otherwise never see the light of day, while also avoiding the use of any US/NATO manpower to massively undermine an adversary. It’s a great deal, i.e. pennies on the dollar.

            I guess it’s edifer to just call everything a “narrative” though than try and understand current events.

            • Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              It’s a great deal if you’re a monster who doesn’t pay any mind to the broken Ukrainian bodies littering the trenches for the past few years. More conscripts for the meat grinder, it’s cost-effective! Fucking ghouls, I swear.

              • spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                And who’s to blame here? Have you considered blaming the invading force, or does it have to be the west for your sensibilities? Everything would be great if we all just rolled over when invaders arrive at the gates!

        • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          pennies on the dollar

          Psychopathic framing. “Look how efficiently we’re killing people!”

          Also great example of conflating states with people. Maybe Ukraine still wants to fight, but Ukrainians are being conscripted against their will. In the same way, wearing Russia down may serve the interests of the US government, but it certainly doesn’t benefit the American people in any way. The best thing for the Ukrainian people would be to stop the killing at any cost, even if it meant territorial concessions. They could’ve saved countless lives if they’d done this from the start, and eventually that’s what’s going to happen anyway, but unfortunately countless people have died and countless more will before the ruling class decides to stop forcing the poor into the meat grinder.

          How the fuck is my life supposed to be better because of dead Russian soldiers?

        • PosadistInevitablity [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          The West has spent many times Russias military budget and hundreds of thousands of soldiers only to lose the war.

          Russia will likely gain several states worth of land.

          Unsure how this is a “good deal”, even in the most psychopathic framing possible. I’d think that would mean Russia is getting the good deal in that case? They have spent far less and gained actual winnings.

    • caveman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      That was propaganda. Without it people would say “why wasting money if they will lose anyway?”

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I was wondering how the media was going to explain the collapse in Ukraine when it finally becomes impossible to hide it, and now we know. The whole thing is going to be blamed on republicans holding up money in congress, as if pouring another 61 billion after all the untold billions that were already poured into this was going to make any difference. The fact that people genuinely believe this is frankly depressing. It shows just how utterly credulous and mentally deficient western public is.

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Countries will get fed up of sending aid to Ukraine long before Russia decides to return its annexed territories. We’re already seeing signs of that.

    If NATO isn’t willing to go in and force the Russians out themselves, I fail to see how this war is anything but a net gain for Russia. They will just sit back and let their “new territories” become more and more Russified.

    To me, the aid is just a delaying tactic to allow Ukraine to continue fighting until the west can figure out a way to accept that Ukraine has lost its territories without losing face.

    It’s a shit show, but I don’t share the optimism that a lot of people have for a Ukrainian victory. It’s like a game of chess, and it’s currently Ukraine/NATOs turn, because the Russians are already dug in.

    • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Over 100k dead Russians isn’t really a “net victory” regardless of territory gained

    • caveman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Ukraine=Palestine. Noone will fight for ir and will get robbed by the powerful bandit, Israel (Rússia).

      Except that US politicians pretend it’s the opposite

      • robinn_IV [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s absolutely absurd to compare the Western settler colony of Israel’s “relationship” with Palestine to the Russia’s relationship with Ukraine. Israel, since its inception, has been oriented towards the subjugation, displacement, and slaughter of Palestinians as a whole, whereas Russia is responding to Western-backed Nazi aggressors. Investigate Operation Aerodynamic, NATO’s Operation Gladio, the US and Nazi role in the 2014 coup, hell what do you mean nobody will fight for Ukraine? The CIA have trained soldiers and there has been billions sent in aid by the US.

        • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I think it’s more Ukraine = Czechcoslovakia, Russia = Nazi Germany. Every justification russia has given I heard germany give in 1938.

          • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            The echo chamber/bubble trope is hilarious because we’re exposed to exactly the same media they are. They’re working with a subset of the information we are and then say we’re in a bubble.

        • InputZero@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          What’s Marvel brain? I tried looking it up but just got a bunch of marvel characters with large heads.

          • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Idealist, cartoonish, black & white, good vs. evil thinking. Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists thinking.

            Imperial core governments and the corporate media present to us a cartoonish, Marvel Cinematic Universe version of the world that serves the capitalist class’ interests, particularly their imperialist interests. Inventing Reality and Manufacturing Consent laid this out almost 40 years ago.

            Ukraine=good=democracy, Russia=bad=authoritarian. Russia’s invasion was unprovoked because history began on Feb. 24, 2022. Russia is doing genocide (bullshit), never mind the previous decade of Ukraine-backed neonazis genociding the people of the Donbas; or that, for 30 years, people from Noam Chomsky to Jeffrey Sachs to Henry Kissinger warned against breaking our promise not to expand NATO eastward toward Russia. Russia is an oligarchy, never mind Ukraine’s oligarchic coup government that the US installed a decade ago. Ukraine is a democracy, never mind that it has suspended opposition parties and cancelled elections.

    • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      They will just sit back and let their “new territories” become more and more Russified.

      The majority people who live there and have always lived there are Russian

      It’s like a game of chess,

      No it really isn’t. Its a proxy war forced by US aggression (2014 coup and NATO encirlement). The US achieved its primary goals - 1) to stop its European vassals (primarily Germany) from gaining energy independence through trade with the Russian Federation and get them back in line 2) to sell old weapon stocks/war profiteering for defense industry and make room for new weapons stores/more profits for defense industry.

      The fact they’ve met these goals is the main reason why funding will stop, because there is no reason to fund Ukraine anymore. The US has won - Ukraine was always going to lose in this scenario.