It gets my goat that people think it’s a good option. There are plenty of articles explaining some of the many issues with it, but a few are:

  1. It’s run by anti-LGBTQ+ crypto bros.
  2. It has ads right out of the box.
  3. It collected donations towards people who never signed up for them - then held them to ransom in exchange for the kind of information you should never share on the Internet.
  4. They’re a for-profit advertising company. “Privacy-centric” my elbow.
  • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Yeah it kinda mystifies me that anyone is still recommending that shitty bigotware.

    In the emulation scene, RetroArch is in a similar boat if I’m understanding things correctly. Awful maintainers, but people keep recommending it and supporting it. Sucks too, because there are even fewer alternatives there.

  • imjustmsk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I don’t think an average person would listen to me if I instructed them to get rid of chrome and get Firefox and install couple extensions for privacy.

    So, I just ask them to download brave and tell them it’s just chrome but better,  It blocks all the annoying stuff on the internet and atleast they will stop using the hell of a pacifier that chrome is and move on.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 hours ago

    They added referrals to links you clicked. If there is one thing a browser should do its go to the link you click without modification.

  • hemmetti@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Brave is just a shitty browser. Did not know they were anti-freedom kind of people. Makes browser no-no.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Honesty your arguments against Brave are pretty weak

    Brave > Chrome

    Brave isn’t great for those who want a lot of private and control. However, it is way better for people to choose Brave over Chrome or Edge.

  • They’re a for-profit advertising company. “Privacy-centric” my elbow.

    a for-profit company partially funded by the billionaire Peter Thiel, of Palantir fame. the same Palantir spying on Americans in order to allow nazis to round up immigrants and throw them into concentration camps. the same Peter Thiel that said democracy is not compatible with freedom.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The same one who wants to create the apocalypse and believes the anti-Christ is anyone who isn’t fascistic

  • qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    4 hours ago
    1. Don’t care.
    2. No it doesn’t.
    3. Don’t care.
    4. They’re a for-profit privacy centric company same as proton, mullvad, tuta, kagi, duckduckgo, nextcloud, adguard, threema, nextDNS, startmail, bitwarden, OsmAnd, organic maps, odysee, obsidian, onlyoffice, 1984 hosting, njalla, canonical, qubesOS, pfSense, fairphone…
    • Senal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      If you reach 20 companies that aren’t ad-centric for-profit companies you can qualify for the false equivalency pro-league.

      It’s up there with mental gymnastics in the bad-faith Olympics, a lofty achievement.

      well. i’ll give you ad-guard , canonical is also making great strides towards ad-centric so that one too.

    • PearOfJudes@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I agree. GrapheneOS uses chromium for Vanadium as it has far superior sandboxing to firefox, meaning it has more security. However vanadium doesn’t have adblocking.

      So I use brave on mobile, with some settings tweaked recommended by privacyguides.org. Also brave uses chromium which is the only way to install grapheneOS in the first place, on desktop.

      Also out of the mainstream browsers brave is far superior to all of them out of the box, even firefox, for those who arne’t into researching the perfect browser. It has in built adblocking and decent default settings. I use librewolf 99% of the time.

      • Side note I did some research proton is owned 80% by the proton non for profit something which is pretty cool.
    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yeah I don’t get the hate. I don’t use it personally but it seems like a much better choice than chrome

  • pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    I have been using Brave for its out of the box ad and tracker blocking. I’d been uncomfortable with the new AI features and had always been skeptical of the crypto integration, but it wasn’t until this post that I realized it was appreciably worse than Firefox on those counts, nor how bad the people running it are.

    Obviously, I’m now looking for other options. I’ve seen some good recs for desktop browsers elsewhere on this post, but what I’m not seeing is a lot of good mobile browser suggestions that will have the desired features. What would the folks here suggest for an e/OS browsing experience with similar or better privacy and ad blocking options? I know there’s Firefox, but A. With all the AI it keeps pushing, I’m sure there has to be better and B. I do also have mobile Firefox but have found it substantially less usable for my habit of browsing with a zillion tabs both non-incognito and incognito, so I mostly had only been it when I couldn’t get a video to play in Brave.

    I am, obviously, willing to run de-Googled Chromium, but if something else is going to actually support 100+ tabs in a performant fashion I’d be happy to totally de-Chromium too.

    I also use the shit out of profiles on Brave desktop, though mobile doesn’t support it. Do the Firefox forks like Waterfox have a similar option on desktop? Does another browser? I know it’s a feature Chrome has because I do sadly have to use Chrome for work, so I would expect at least the de-Googled Chromium-based ones would?

    • pet the cat, walk the dog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I have the habit of running Firefox on Android with thousands of tabs (before unloading them into a list on the desktop and cleaning them up). It does slow down somewhat, but not much.

    • rodneylives@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I use Vivaldi as a secondary browser, it’s not been too bad. Firefox is my primary, but I might go to a fork soon.

    • stochastictrebuchet@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I’ve been using Vivaldi (chromium-based) for about three years now. It’s customizable and has been generally solid. Also has a couple of unique tab management features. Doesn’t have builtin ad blocking afaik. But for that I use adguard desktop and route all my traffic through it, which filters out ads regardless of which browser I’m in. On iOS I can recommend Orion by kagi. It’s the only other webkit browser besides Safari, runs light, and has decent builtin ad blocking

    • Cevilia (they/she/…)@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Firefox (and its forks) have an integrated profile manager, though it’s not always intuitive to figure out how to get to it. LibreWolf is the fork I seem to always go back to, and it has zero slop.

      I use containers. Right-click on the new tab button and pick a container to open the tab in. There’s also an add-on that will do this automatically for you when you visit a specific website, so if you want every site to live in its own container, you can do that too.

      Personally I just use its built-in cross-site cookie blocking, but multiple ways to do the same thing.

      • pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        LibreWolf looks promising. No mobile app, but they recommend IronFox for that, so I just downloaded that to play with. Thanks!

        Edit: mobile IronFox is looking pretty good so far. Made configuring privacy settings an option just out of the box, which I appreciate. Biggest problem right now is that I can’t seem to figure out how to import my bookmarks from Brave.

        • Cevilia (they/she/…)@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          35 minutes ago

          LibreWolf is great once you get yourself onboarded. The onboarding royally sucks. You need to remember that by default LibreWolf is really locked down and it’s on the user to unlock the bits of it they can’t live without. For instance, by default LibreWolf clears its cookies every time you quit, which is great for privacy, but everything’s a tradeoff and that’s too much for me.

        • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          LibreWolf

          I had soooo many issues with LibreWolf, finally switched to waterfox. If this doesnt pan out, I quit the interweebs

    • pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Currently trying mobile IronFox. I’m liking the privacy options and how stuff like unlock origin is literally included in the setup process. Their dark mode is nice and they offer a lot of compatibility options.

      Biggest downsides I’m seeing so far (I’ll see about keeping this updated as I go):

      1. Can’t seem to figure out how to import my bookmarks from Brave, and I have looked extensively.
      2. No tab groups (not the end of the world, but it was a nice feature). EDIT: Looks like Collections does that! EDIT TWO: Not really good for Incognito mode though.
      3. Clears your browser history by default on close, which may be undesired behavior. (I personally tend to use incognito for most things and then transfer sites over to tabs in non-incognito (cognito?) modes if I want them available regularly, so for me this was undesired, but it was easy to turn off.)
      4. Brave had a built-in experimental dark mode to dark modify websites that I am not seeing in IronFox. I’m sure there are extensions that will do it for me, so I’ll go looking, but I just discovered so many sites I did not realize were light mode all along. Reading mode also does the trick for most articles.
      • Cevilia (they/she/…)@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        31 minutes ago

        Also 1. in Brave: Bookmarks and lists, Bookmark manager, three dot menu, Export Bookmarks, save the HTML file on your computer. Then in LibreWolf/IronFox/whatever: Bookmarks, Manage Bookmarks, Import and Backup, Import Bookmarks from HTML, select that file.

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        He also created JavaScript, but I don’t see people getting upset and telling others to not use JavaScript.

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Well, JavaScript has a lot of horrible features, but it’s ubiquitous and we’re stuck with it for the time being. Certainly it’s another thing to blame Eich for, rather than something that mitigates his other shitty behavior.

          • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Neither does Brave unless you specifically opt in to those services. It’s open source, you can check for yourself.

  • Mikina@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    214
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    It’s a for profit ad company making a “privacy first browser”.

    Thinking for literaly a second about that sentence should tell you all you need to know.

    • Electricd@lemmybefree.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      you can do privacy friendly ads, it’s not because the entire industry has evolved to an horrible point that the good way of doing it can’t exist

      • rodneylives@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        This is true. Ryan North of Dinosaur Comics used to run and maintain a good sort of ad service called Project Wonderful, that catered to webcomics and blogs and didn’t track users. Sadly he shut it down in 2018.

        Currently I know of Comicad Network that’s trying a similar kind of thing.

  • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I’d like to hear more about #3 and #4. They seem to be a software company. Of course, that doesn’t mean that they can’t also be an advertising company (see Google).

  • No1@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Any recommendations for 3 requirements:

    1. Need android and Linux. Windows maybe, but don’t care much.
    2. Must be able to open local html files. This means no Firefox and derivatives as it can’t open local files on android.
    3. Must reliably sync at least bookmarks. I last switched from Vivaldi because their sync was busted for months.

    Happy to try out anything

  • Enkrod@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    148
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    19 hours ago
    1. it’s fucking Chromium

    Go use some Firefox-derivative like Librewolf or Fennec, like a sane person.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Yeah, this is important. Fuck Google. I will only ever use a chromium browser if I have to for work or for a misbehaving website.

      • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I don’t know enough about browsers to really know anything about chromium. But I did see a statement from Google which I believe stated that they were removing support for adblockers from chromium based browsers. It was at that point that I decided I did want to continue having a usable browsing experience, and immediately swapped.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I will reject the misbehaving website rather than resort to using Chromium.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Occasionally though, life requires using a shit website. I do avoid it if possible though

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Your attitude is very reasonable. I strive to be as unreasonable as I can.

            reference

            “The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.” ― George Bernard Shaw

            • unconfirmedsourcesDOTgov@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              10 hours ago

              This is hilarious for me if only because at some point ages ago I tagged you with, simply, “seems reasonable”.

              Fortunately, I also agree with your reasoning for being unreasonable, thus returning you back to the realm of reasonability while striving to be unreasonable.

    • Electricd@lemmybefree.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Librewolf’s defaults are so bad, and changing them basically entirely removes the anti fingerprinting features

      • towerful@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Never used librewolf.
        But it sounds like the conveniences you want are a compromise for fingerprinting.

        Don’t let perfect stand in the way of good.
        The internet has been significantly ruined by large companies.
        There is a loop where companies with the resources to create and maintain frameworks/tooling/whatever are large enough to help define “features” for browsers.
        Browsers don’t make money, not really. To even be considered, they have to be able to run what the big companies are pushing.
        All of this makes it very easy for smaller companies to deliver better websites. Or abuse the features big companies are pushing.

        It’s like: email was awesome, then spam emails happened. Websites were accessible, then SPAs happened. Search engines were useful, the scraping/AI happened.

        I don’t know what I am trying to say.
        Other than browsers do not get the support they deserve to actually be decent unless they are backed by a company that wants to loss-lead them… Which has resulted in the web being pretty fucked

  • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Just mentioned how I didn’t like people recommending this like last week and got “ok” as a response lol. Some people are just ignorant and don’t care.