Good video, very much worth watching despite the length. New UI will look something like this:

with an option for a more classic look.

Looks like an enourmous UX improvement too, and a rewrite to QT and eliminating a lot of technical debt will make development faster.

  • Horsey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    30 minutes ago

    Holy shit yes. Also while we’re at it please guys add an option to put the timeline in just seconds instead of minutes:seconds

  • morto@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Full UI overhaul?! I can’t believe they had the audacity to do this!

    • NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      They are adding “AI” features in a collaboration with Intel, but luckily they’re minor additions like ML based noise reduction

    • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      And what exactly does Tenacity bring to the table other than a name replace across the code-base?

      The non-destructive editing and realtime effects alone are a huge jump in capability between the current and old versions of Audacity, and that’s before we even discuss UI improvements

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        From what I could tell when I looked into it after a comment someone left on !nebula@lemmy.world, some people were very upset at the privacy implications of Audacity adding an update detection mechanism (which can be turned off, and which is not included at all in the default build if you build it yourself).

        • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Are people are actually upset about an auto update feature? A feature that has been pretty standard in programs for a very long time?

          I understood some of the upset when they added telemetry, but auto-update?

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 minutes ago

            Not even auto-update. Just auto detect updates. Then you go and download it yourself manually.

            Auto-update-detection meant that the software was calling out to a remote server, so they updated the TOS to reflect that, and people got upset.

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 hours ago

      they backtracked on the privacy policy and said they had really overzealous lawyers that they somehow mistrusted lawyers doing so “out of an abundance of caution” so i’m still giving them one final chance here since that issue was resolved rather quickly (within two weeks, which is why i’m not absolving them and giving them a chance, but it’s been uneventful since 2021 so i think that strike’s gonna expire in a year)

      and i don’t think the telemetry was every an issue since it was always going to be opt-in

      tenacity does not have the rally useful beats and measures feature for some reason

      • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 minutes ago

        if the concern is just about telemetry, I seriously wonder why Tenacity isn’t just a soft fork of Audacity, like VSCodium is to VS code, or Librewolf to Firefox.

        that way you get the best of both worlds, the amazing new features in Audacity, without the worry of corporate control

  • Mark with a Z@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Watched last weekend. Not a huge fan of the rebrand, but the changes that actually count look great.

    • clb92@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah, the branding is definitely ‘meh’ at best, but even worse, in my opinion, is the tight integration with the whole Muse ecosystem and MuseHub thing (and the default download on the website being the MuseHub-based installer too) and built-in cloud storage crap. It just feels wrong to have an open source application integrated so tightly into all their proprietary services all the way through. Just installed the latest version 3.7.5, and I was surprised at how much nagging there was, on both the website and in the application itself.

      But other than the whole Muse stuff, Audacity 4.0 looks really awesome in terms of UI and UX. And at least there is a non-MuseHub installer and you can choose not to use their other stuff, and say no to the telemetry…

      • Blisterexe@lemmy.zipOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Frankly, since it’s still open source, I’m ok with it since it also means developpement is much faster, and you can avoid it. At least for me when I installed it on linux through the app store, I didn’t notice any of your complaints.

        As someone with no attachement to the previous branding I quite like the new branding though, fits the new vibe of the app quite well.

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        i’ve never had noticeable lag in audacity besides a niche crash that got fixed. though the cloud storage thing never ever worked for me. it’s nice though and you still save locally instead of to cloud by default. plusi think the musehub thing is kinda explainable with the proprietary effects marketplace they added to musehub, and it’s not like audacity plugins were always foss anyways

        • clb92@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          i’ve never had noticeable lag

          I think you misread ‘nagging’ as ‘lagging’ in my comment