i’ll wager, from an armchair mind you, that this is because decrepeit Scrooges see it as a plus that the people from the regions most affected as “lesser people”, while also holding on to money and ensuring states militarize to defend that money from increasingly pissed of people.

so TLDR ig racist old dudes appreciating what fascism does for 'em.

this is just an armchair assessment fron me though. why is fossil fuel still being used?

  • Cevilia (she/they/…)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Because the fossil fuel companies are breathtakingly rich and willing to share that wealth with politicians in return for policy decisions that favour fossil fuel companies.

    See also “lobbying”, “bribery”, and “corruption”.

    • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I get why you would say this, but it’s an oversimplification to the point of being completely wrong.

      Fossil fuels have an absurd energy density. They’re just really hard to beat. Modern batteries and liquid hydrogen don’t even come close. Pair that with the fact that we’ve spent a couple hundred years optimising the steam- and internal combustion engines, compared to some decades (in practice) for electric-based stuff, and you start seeing why fossil fuels are so hard to push of the top of the hill.

      Until very recently all alternatives were pretty much worse under every conceivable performance metric. There’s a reason electric planes are still in the prototype phase. It’s just technically really really hard to even get close to jet fuel and combustion engines.

      • Cevilia (she/they/…)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Completely wrong? Let me test my understanding. You’re claiming that fossil fuel companies are not breathtakingly rich and willing to share that wealth with politicians in return for policy decisions that favour fossil fuel companies?