I’ll start by saying that I would say “Yyyyeah, and one of the first cellphones and also the very first 0G telephone service (Altai) was made in the Soviet Union under socialism, go figure”. What would you say?

    • DylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      “Socialism involves people owning the means of production (whether in a market economy or a planned one). Communism involves exactly that as well, but in a classless stateless moneyless society. No class war, no state, no money, no problem.”

      • Airowird@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Socialism is a form of government where the equality of people comes first.

        The entire US anti-socialist kneejerk is because Marx said that socialism as a stepping stone to communism is the only non-violent way to get there

        Socialist democracy allows for capitalism, as long as the government protects its people from the capitalist tendancy to turn into an oligarchy.

        • DylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Socialist democracy allows for capitalism, as long as the government protects its people from the capitalist tendancy to turn into an oligarchy.

          Are you talking about market socialism?

          • Airowird@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Sorta, depending on your exact definition.

            More of a Lassalle flavour of socialism than Marx, at the very least.

            Pragmatically, state-less communism is a utopia reliant on all members following its principles. A state is required to defend against greed, both from the outside as from within.

            Wwhether you call it market socialism or social democracy, the concept of a state limits capitalism to serve its people first, while also granting as much freedom possible by “allowing” capitalism, seems to be the closest one can get to Marxism while still defending against tyranny.

            Society is a living thing and must be able to both change and defend itself. Socialist states are prone to tyranny from within, where as pure communist utopia has little to no defense from foreign entities. A democratic government in service of the people is the best way I’m aware of to achieve the core socialist principles.