Last week’s surprise departure of Phil Spencer from Microsoft led to the promotion of Asha Sharma, who comes to head Microsoft’s gaming division after two years as president of the company’s CoreAI Product group. Despite that recent history, Sharma says in a new interview that she has “no tolerance for bad AI” in game development.

Meanwhile the head of another Soulless Tech Corporation Hellbent On Dehumanizing Game Development In Every Sense Of The Word “Dehumanize” Possible reminds us…

CEO Tim Sweeney says requiring developers to disclose their use of AI tools is as relevant as disclosing “what shampoo brand the developer uses,”

  • it_depends_man@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Being a personal fan of video games isn’t necessarily required to succeed in running a gaming company.

    What the F***, yes it is.

    (that’s arstechnica saying that though, not the new xbox boss person)

    • Decq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      They just made a small typo, it can happen to everyone.

      isn’t necessarily required to succeed in ruining a gaming company

    • Adalast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      This quote reminds me of the owner of this one TTRPG and card shop in my area. If you try to talk to him about literally anything he sells he will straight tell you he does not care about anything he sells. All the nerdy shit under one roof and his ass is there because nerds will pay through the nose for it.

      Needless to say I shop at the store where the owner participates on FNM every week and runs D&D campaigns.

      • it_depends_man@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        That’s a bit different, because he’s selling finished products. He can just check all the boxes from star wars over dnd to collectible card games and order the value pack from a middle man and then it’s all about the location of the shop and the competition in the area.

        You don’t have to understand why a specific product works if what you’re doing is essentially providing a mixed physical storefront for a bunch of corporations.

        But this lady is now going to have to make important strategic decisions, about which games to give funding, which ones to cancel, what kind of hardware to even envision.

        Compare it to valve, who sat down and build their own controller and handheld, because they looked at 20 years of market and product development and thought they could do better and delivered. You have to know a lot about why you want hardware for what purpose and what makes it better or worse for that purpose to do that.

        XBOX, theoretically, same as any other big name in media, could be the place where a new media franchise is born that dominates the next 50 years of pop culture. THAT is the kind of position this is.

        That they won’t because they can’t “build the next skyrim / WoW” is kind of the problem.

    • blinfabian@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      i guess you dont if you know exactly what gamers want and youre a marketing genius. but i doubt thats the case and being into gaming would certainly help

    • rogsson@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The whole reason we’re in this mess with AAA is solely because of suits with no gaming interest whatsoever making all the decisions to please shareholders

        • rogsson@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          And, stay with me now - manipulate children to create generational gambling addicts - ooohohoo think of all the easy money flowing in!

    • Xenny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      There are exceptions to this. There are wonderful game designers that personally don’t play video games.

      I really doubt this woman is an exception though

      • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        It sucks to say, but I’d actually wager there’s more game developers and designers that don’t play games regularly than ones that do. The time and mental investment necessary to create games doesn’t tend to leave much room for enjoying them.

        But probably really should at least consider yourself a fan of games in the industry, even if you can’t keep up playing the latest and greatest.

      • MrQuallzin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I’d go further and compare this to actors who many times will never watch the finished product. IIRC, John de Lancie voiced Discord in My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic but never watched any of the episodes until the fandom really took off. He was surprised this small role he forgot he even did gained such popularity! I’m sure he’s seen a number of episodes by now, especially since he later reprised his role

  • finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Speaking with Variety, Sharma noted that “AI has long been part of gaming and will continue to be,” before adding that “great stories are created by humans.” The interview comes after Sharma promised in an introductory memo: “We will not chase short-term efficiency or flood our ecosystem with soulless AI slop. Games are and always will be art, crafted by humans, and created with the most innovative technology provided by us.”

    Shocking take from a microsoft employee making a public statement. I had thought their leadership were all aboard the moron express to slopville.

    • marighost@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      “AI has long been part of gaming and will continue to be,”

      This is such bullshit. AI has only really invaded gaming in the past couple of years, but she makes it sounds like AI (in its current iterations) has been around been around forever.

      • finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I think they’re using AI as the umbrella term there, rather than referring to LLMs and generative slop. The term has been used to mean many different things over the years, including the decision trees that drive npc movement and action.

    • rem26_art@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Microsoft’s really been on that “I’ll do everything in my power to make number go up that isn’t making a better product” grind for a long time now yea

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Except shampoo brands don’t invalidate copyright protections for their games.

    If you use ai to create any part of a game, that part doesn’t have copyright/IP protections. If you don’t know what parts that is, the entire thing loses said protections.

    Details.

    • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Someone needs to make an ex-Xbox for exes of Xbox.

      looks down at Steam Deck in lap

      I’ll get a sharpie.