Results of the imperialist aggression: An 86 year old dead 150 school children vaporized Regime is still there American based in the zone turned to rubble Strait of hormuz closed
They actually let him stay in his house? Did they want him as a martyr or something?
He was 86 years old and dying. I’d want to stay in my own house too
At that point he might have just wanted to go out on his own terms, and martyred by the USA are great terms to go out on by his ideology. I wouldn’t be surprised if this strengthens the resolve of the true believers.
That psychotic demon netanyahu needs to be sent back to Lucifer.
This is literally fascism.
I have no idea what you’re talking about. The Iran? USA? Israel?
And why is it fascism? Like a lot of what has happened in the USA was pretty fascist, but starting a war isn’t part of the list. There are a few definitions of fascism (e.g. by Adorno), so which one are you using here?
What do you mean, I’m really confused here.
Define fascism
Humanity
Naw it’s more fun to get historical with it
op might be referring to perpetual war
Oh true I’m so aggro rn. I was thinking like the lib conception of having a charismatic leader = personality cult = fascism. I really do love having that argument too much
Americans love bravado. This will be millions of Republican votes.
Watch them lose their fucking minds when the price of gas goes up.
Gas is expensive. Life is cheap.
Wait for the market to open
I made the mistake of flipping through MSN headlines last night when I went to bed. The first mention if USA invasion of Iran was a Barrons article about what it meant for energy portfolios.
It’s worth noting that Khamenei was the main reason Iran did not develop nuclear weapons up to now. With him gone, that becomes a much more likely scenario.
How?
Khamenei issued a religieus ruling against developing nukes
But they were still enriching uranium covertly. How’s that?
Having enough 60% enriched uranium to make a thermonuclear bomb if they change the ruling ≠ weaponizing their nuclear program
Nuclear power?
Deleted by author
One of the few leaders of the world older then trump. It would really behoove us all if more old as fuck worthless leaders were put out to pasture.
Israel going unchallenged in the region will be the worst possible outcome if Iran falls.
So the US has taken action against two heads of state in two months, and the rest of the world is not at all worried?
I mean, if fair is fair, this should be a free-for-all, so I’d be all for Netanyahu, Bbukele and Putin going up in smoke next.
They are worried, but most of them are maintaining tenuous comprador regimes where their ruling classes’ finances are firmly linked to the imperial core
Trump’s safe in your book?
He has to at least answer for his pedophilia before he goes up in smoke. And besides, forget the smoke, I want to see him under the guillotine, his head framed as an example of What Not To Do.
Whelp.
He was 86. I don’t know to what extent he was still in charge. It may have been anywhere from still fully in charge to just a figurehead.
Rest in peace. May the US Empire and its dogs crumble.
He’s probably resting in pieces, not peace.
Show some respect you rabid Westerner dog with no value for anything. Your dirty country will be soon paying the cost, make no mistake.
Today the US and Israel bombed and killed 85 people in an all girls school.
Death to amerikkka
Well war over now right? Trump said the goal was regime change. We’ll mission accomplished. Right?
The regime is not one person not to say that trump would not find more excuses if the regime really fall
In the model of Venezuela as long as the actual top leader isn’t in charge anymore, it’s regime change.
Fascist USA and Israel are the biggest threats to world peace. They are the axis of evil.
And Russia
No. Most of what Russia does on the world stage is good, it is one of the biggest supporters of many global south countries and one of the few remaining bulwarks preventing US imperialism from running completely roughshod over the global south. For example right now, see Cuba and how Russia is providing support and oil as the US tries to starve them of energy and starve them to death. You may have been taught Putler=Voldemort, but no, Russia at this point is acting largely as a force for good in the world.
Lol. Another tankie retard.
When they stop murdering children in Ukraine, which they can do literally any time they want, then I’ll be more inclined to believe you.
Can they really be a “threat” when they’re actively killing people all over the world?
Yeah, more accurately they are the active enemies of world peace.
First two months of 2026: The US kidnaps one country’s leader, murders another, and kills hundreds of civilians in two failed regime change attempts.
Death to the burger empire.
Death to the burger empire.
You’d be surprised how long dead ideas live
The scary part is how they succeed in their objectives. I’m still not over Maduro’s kidnapping and how they pulled it off. It’s freakish.
No, they didn’t succeed. Their objectives were regime change, that didn’t happen. You could at the most say that Venezuela is now more cohoperative but they didn’t install a comprador.
The scary part is how they succeed in their objectives.
US government spends more than a trillion dollar on war each year.
the military fully backed him thats why, not like donald planed it out, they did under his general order. that and kidnaping moduro hasn’t really changed the country much after hes gone.
The real battle happens before any shots are fired.
Kidnapping Maduro didn’t accomplish any of their stated objectives in Venezuela. It looks like the White House didn’t even confer with energy companies about the viability of expanding their oil production?! They flipped their script immediately afterwards and claimed they won. You’d have to be a doomer to believe it.
Although, it’s worth noting that this was largely a stunt. The US did not have the ability to actually invade Venezuela or to topple the government.
It was indeed a stunt, keep in mind that the US spend trillions to maintain an army capable of invading other countries, it’s just not convenient for them to do so.
It’s more than just inconvenience. The US does not have a good track record fighting prolonged conflicts. They can destroy a country and make millions of people suffer, but they rarely achieve long term objectives.
I would argue that their long term objectives are usually achieved, USA pretty much control the whole world.
the US absolutely doesn’t control the world, the war in Ukraine and recent attempt at a trade war with China is a great example of just how weak the empire really is. The US failed to subdue Russia and their attempt to cut Russia out of the global economy resulted in a separate economic system forming with increasing amount of trade happening outside western control. Now, global majority is allied with China against the empire, and hence why we see the US desperately lashing out.
The US has hit an inflection point where the cost of maintaining the empire outstrips the plunder. All the forever wars have drained critical resources, while financial capitalism moved essential production overseas. Now the US finds that it has little economic leverage, and its material base is eroded.
You’d argue and you’d lose that argument. If you think the Empire controls the world then you’re clearly not seeing or you don’t want to see how it’s collapsing. If they would have accomplished their objectives they wouldn’t have a single opposition force in the world, yet there are plenty. Maybe you think the world is white people only? Because they do have control over all of their colonies and they are all white Westerners.
These sorts of attacks is what the US military has been investing in capacity to complete for decades. This is why there has been an investment bleeding edge tech which costs insane amounts of money to develop.
No, insane costs are due to how the military industrial complex rules the country and inflates prices because it needs more profits. Costs do not necessarily mean more sophisticated or that have an actual improvement in the battlefield. In fact recent trends show the opposite, the cheaper the tech the better output it produces on the battlefield. It’s low cost vehicles, missiles and drones that are leading the battle, not 20 trillion F-35s.
