the cap on House seats was a deliberate move to restrict the power of cities/progressive forces of the time, it wasnt some accident/short-sightedness
make it more expensive to campaign (because you have to reach so many more people) and you effectively force out independent canidates
even if House seats were increased to something sane like 150-200k pop/seat (currently at 800k+, iirc), the senate effectively gives 2/3rds of national political power to 1/3rd of the country. there is no means for the House to completely bypass the Senate
But just in general, it’s almost always best to blame political leaders for a government’s actions and not just blame every person living there.
Good and bad.
Agreed, frustration gets to me, considering I come from the Middle East I tend to have very conflicting emotions, having grown up in England I appreciate law and order, equality and an attitude of live and let live. But when my friends and family are in direct danger, my anger rages.
If they do it right they only need 22% of the popular vote to win the presidentance, so yeah don’t say it is all Americans that want this when such a small number is needed to win.
You can win with like 2 dozen votes. Not percent. Individual votes. Regardless of how many millions vote for the opposition. Like rounding error above 0% of the popular vote could theoretically “win”. It’s so fucking broken
That’s rather f’ed up.
That’s not even the worst…
Our House of representatives is supposed to make up for it, but each rep represents over 20x the people they did when the country was founded.
The reason we lost so much representation, is the room they occasionally meet in would be too cramped if they kept adding chairs to it.
But just in general, it’s almost always best to blame political leaders for a government’s actions and not just blame every person living there.
Good and bad.
the cap on House seats was a deliberate move to restrict the power of cities/progressive forces of the time, it wasnt some accident/short-sightedness
make it more expensive to campaign (because you have to reach so many more people) and you effectively force out independent canidates
even if House seats were increased to something sane like 150-200k pop/seat (currently at 800k+, iirc), the senate effectively gives 2/3rds of national political power to 1/3rd of the country. there is no means for the House to completely bypass the Senate
What if those reps had a big, beautiful former ballroom to occupy? That would be pretty cool, someone should get on that.
Agreed, frustration gets to me, considering I come from the Middle East I tend to have very conflicting emotions, having grown up in England I appreciate law and order, equality and an attitude of live and let live. But when my friends and family are in direct danger, my anger rages.
If they do it right they only need 22% of the popular vote to win the presidentance, so yeah don’t say it is all Americans that want this when such a small number is needed to win.
You can win with like 2 dozen votes. Not percent. Individual votes. Regardless of how many millions vote for the opposition. Like rounding error above 0% of the popular vote could theoretically “win”. It’s so fucking broken
America looks like it needs some “Democracy”