It gets my goat that people think it’s a good option. There are plenty of articles explaining some of the many issues with it, but a few are:

  1. It’s run by anti-LGBTQ+ crypto bros.
  2. It has ads right out of the box.
  3. It collected donations towards people who never signed up for them - then held them to ransom in exchange for the kind of information you should never share on the Internet.
  4. They’re a for-profit advertising company. “Privacy-centric” my elbow.
  • lad@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    As far as I remember, there is some browser with a feature of stripping tracking id from the URL, that is modification, but I find it good (if I can opt in, and if the feature is visible enough to know what to try if it doesn’t work)

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      And you chose to do that or it was a feature that was advertised to you. Adding referral IDs to links you click so the browser company gets money is not comparable to that at all.

      • lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Mind you, I’m not arguing that was crappy, just that not any modification of links is bad

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I would argue that if you know your browser is stripping tracking info for links then the link you clicked on doesn’t have tracking information.