- cross-posted to:
- science@beehaw.org
- cross-posted to:
- science@beehaw.org
You must log in or register to comment.
Doesn’t this imply that there are more trans people in Republican areas than non-Republican areas?
The only exposure Republicans have to the outside world is through porn
Everything going on with the femboy heatmap is incredible. All the red and blue areas of the southwest doing the handshake meme. The population cachment areas of fucking Scranton and Pueblo of all places going all in for some reason. The smooth cultural gradient in Cascadia.
It’s also in the wrong article because femboys aren’t trans, but it is funny to contrast it with the map for ‘shemale’ (eugh)
They don’t even hide it, the Manosphere paradoxaly loves femboys.
The straightest thing you can do is blow your homie.
They don’t see it that way cause they think being a top isn’t gay.
Ironically, they’re treating trans women the same way they treat cis women—as sexual objects who don’t deserve bodily autonomy.
removed by mod
I ain’t beatin’ my meat to trans porn! I swear! I’m just… I’m just researching the enemy!
Yeah 14 hours of researchin, i really gotta know what to look out for. Yeah and those noises i was frying some chicken, nothing goes better than cock with researchin.
On the bright side, once trans people start to disappear, they will be the first to rebell.
Ok, maybe just hoping.
What deliverance was based on a true story?
Everyday I find myself completely baffled by human behavior. There are days I legitimately do not think I’m the same species.
If I hate someone, I genuinely hate 1athem. Like Gary that I worked with in 2003. 20+ years later, and I STILL think he’s one of the biggest 1assholes I ever met.
1At NO POINT do I want Gary porn. Maybe Gary death porn, but not sexual porn. I’d like to see him walk into a walk-in closet, when a bunch of spinning blades shoot out and cut him into tiny dice sized cubes.
But these people claim to hate trans folks, but then go home and beat their meat to them? Where’s the hate then??? If you’re going to hate someone, truely hate them because they stand for everything you dispise. Otherwise, you’re just saying your own values mean nothing to you, and you shouldn’t be taken seriously at face value.
And in this particular case, why even bother hating trans people at all? Just accept trans people for who they are, and bust all the nuts you want without being a hypocrite.
Aside from kids and animals, there aren’t many kinks I’d look down on people for, as long as they’re just true to themselves. I may not like the idea of licking feet, but if thats your thing, own up to it! Be yourself!
Fuck Gary!
Most people are more complex than black-and-white, most of my co-workers are freenemies.
Enemies to lovers is such a common trope too.
Question:
What’s up with those 1s in front of your 'a’s in paragraph 2?
What did you do Gary?
Typos. I was walking while typing this, and my finger must have touched the keyboard a few times.
Why the random numbers
THE NUMBERS, MASON!
WHAT DO THEY MEAN??
Article says there are more searches for trans-related keywords in GOP areas. However it doesn’t say anything about trans porn searches vs cis porn searches. It wouldn’t surprise me if conservative areas have more searches for porn in general, so all the numbers are higher. Anyway the article uses a lot of statistical jargon without seeming to check this basic issue. FAIL.
Yeah, it’s just correlation, which does not mean it’s true, the reason could be a different one
Yeah, and if it did, I feel like it’s their vigilante fantasy scour. Not genuine crank material. Either way, unhealthy obsession.
They can’t get off if it’s mainstream, they need their fetishes to be taboo, and preferably illegal. So, they make it illegal, then rub themselves raw over it.
Huh, and here I thought we didn’t like any of the same things.
You see the performers as people. They see the performers as fuckmeat. You are not the same.
Very good point. I also see now that this is only focused on search terms for MtF folk. I’m an equal opportunity gooner, I enjoy some fine-ass FtM peeps in porn too. I have a feeling they don’t.
**Search terms for the list ranking include only: “shemale”, “tranny”, “femboy”, and “ladyboy”
They’re going to be missing a large chunk by excluding drawn/cartoon/anime type categories and terms like futa.
Although, not sure how well the southern peeps are gonna know any words coming from other cultures to reference what they’re looking for.
I think it’s interesting that the terms are predominately slur form too, which you’d expect to be more common amongst conservatives.
I mean we’ve seen Alex Jones with a “Naughty tbabe” tab open on his phone.
the article does have this headline but doesn’t actually back it up (convincingly) at all. it seems to thinks googling ‘“shemale”, “tranny”, “femboy”, and “ladyboy”’’ counts as searching for trans porn. kelsey libert doesn’t seem to have any relevant qualifications either
Also, who uses google to search for porn? This research appears to be making a LOT of assumptions about what their data actually represents.
I have a better argument here than they do that based on the number of comments here progressives only look for the facts they want to hear without reading the actual articles /j
Hell ya! I was worried I was a republican their for a second ( /s ) luckily those are not the terms I use to search for trans porn but like I also show trans people and people regardless of gender respect.
Side note, I get the other terms coming from right wing ignorant assholes but feel femboy is not that bad, am I wrong on this? I have not yet read the article.
We’ve heard lots of people referring to themselves as femboys. So probably not that bad.
But a femboy (in the context we’re used to) isn’t a trans woman, it’s a boy with feminine qualities, I think (while still being male).
– Frost
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/forbidden_fruit_is_the_sweetest
Proverb
forbidden fruit is the sweetest
- Forbidden things seem more appealing; people desire things more if (or, in some way, because) they can’t have them.
Also curiousity due to lack of sexual education.
