• iByteABit@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Unlike a certain “country” nearby that does so without warning, and then a second time to take out the rescue groups trying to save children as well

    • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      That’s cause they don’t actually want to strike them. They will if they have to, but their goal is to prevent the US from hitting their civilian infrastructure by telling them what they’ll hit in retaliation.
      And the data centers are only step 1.
      Iran could kill the Gulf States entirely by hitting the desalination plants.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      On the other hand, if my workplace was on a list of announced missile targets, I’d stay away.

      Assuming that there’s no real chance of their enemy setting up a defense in time:

      • It reduces probability of civilian causalities (improves their international image, reduces incentives for affected people to join the fight against them)
      • If there is some failure in the attack and the center isn’t disabled, they still reduced productivity. I’d say indefinitely
      • Tactic could theoretically be used to threaten or feint. For example, publicly list five target but only bother bombing three, and you get the benefits of scaring away people at the other two without spending weapons. This could also be used to manipulate enemy logistics, like moving their defenses or response teams to one place and then attacking another.
    • Zedd @lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Iran has frequently announced targets and given warnings to evacuate. It’s been surreal that they’ve continued to sound like the adults after years of being told how evil they are. The US is indiscriminately bombing everything, while Iran seems to be playing the long game of building an international case for reparations and prosecution.

    • Clockwork@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It isn’t when you have complete tactical superiority and you want to intimidate your opppnents

        • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 hours ago

          you clearly have not been up to date with this war, because they weren’t able to intercept shit, besides, do you think they’re going to move air defense away from nazisrael to protect data centers? or desalinization plants? or oil rigs? you can barely protect 1 of these targets, let alone all at the same time…

        • StaticFalconar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Which would leave other targets open to attack since we don’t have enough counter drone stuff to defend everything. We’re playing chess here not checkers.

          • bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Maybe the goal is to waste interceptors on a shitty data center thats going to get blown up anyway because the interceptors dont work

            • normanwall@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Or to distract the interceptor response

              Can you fucking imagine if Bezos or Altman are bribing Israel to prioritise their data centres over human life (I await the articles from military leakers)