• blahsay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Generally stopping shooting is a great step towards peace. I guess you’re sad the Palestinians will get fed?

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m talking about a ceasefire, which is not directly tied to food since they have already delivered some food without a ceasefire.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Baby steps. Let’s try to stop killing each other, then we can figure out how to remain stopped and keep from starting again

          • snooggums@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Previous ceasefire for set times went right back to genocide, so forgive me if I have doubts about a longer one having better results.

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Did previous ceasefire attempts get any agreement? Or actually happen?

              One difference is previous attempts were negotiated by Qatar, which has some influence with Hamas, while this was proposed by the US which has some influence with Israel. There’s also building global pressure to end the atrocities.

              Especially since your phrasing appears to blame Israel, surely influence with Israel must give some hope?

              More importantly, all you can do is keep trying until it sticks. I really think that’s a pattern regardless of the country or the violence: first attempt at a ceasefire rarely works but if you keep trying, it will eventually.

              • snooggums@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                There was a short one earlier on for a shotage exchange. Since then Israel leaned even harder into ‘eradicating Hamas’ while slaughtering women and children as 3/4 of deaths, forced Palestinians into smaller ‘safe zones’, and other steps in genocide.

                That is why there is reluctance to give up the hostages for a temporary ceasefire.

        • mwguy@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          And what terms do you propose that would be observed by Hamas?

            • DarkGamer@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              The reason there’s a massive security apparatus around Palestine is not to oppress Palestinians or impose racial hierarchy, it is because they have been trying to murder Jews for the last 70+ years.

              The violence against Israel is the reason for this. Hamas is a cause of the violence. They create the very situation they say they want to end.

              If they want the walls to come down and the blockade to end, they need to show a commitment to peace, rather than a commitment to genocide.

              • Emily (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                The violence against Palestinians is the reason for this. Zionism/Israel is a cause of the violence. They create the very situation they say they want to end.

                If they want the walls to come down and the blockade to end, they need to show a commitment to peace, rather than a commitment to genocide.

              • po-lina-ergi@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Super weird that when you commit a genocide against a people and then colonise their land they aren’t thrilled about it.

          • snooggums@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            I can confidently say that if Israel stops supporting settlers taking Palestinian homes, killing Palestinians indiscriminately, and no longer enforce apartheid Hamas would observe an end to violent hostilities.

            It isn’t like Hamas can offer more than not being the instigator of violence, and if your calender goes back further than October you will see that Hamas arose to power in response to Israeli violence.

            • BarbecueCowboy@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              It’s a nice thought and I’d hope the majority of the Palestinian people might… settle for that, but Hamas itself is founded on principles that are fairly extreme. Their charter is real rough, a paragraph early on about murdering all Jews everywhere is just the start.

              Hamas has defined their government based on perpetual war and other problematic conditions. It’s difficult to envision a lasting peace while they’re still around.

              • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                They stated they’d accept a two-state solution in 2017, but honestly what they’d accept doesn’t matter. They’d have two options: Adapt or go the way of the IRA.

            • mwguy@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              I can confidently say that if Israel stops supporting settlers taking Palestinian homes, killing Palestinians indiscriminately, and no longer enforce apartheid Hamas would observe an end to violent hostilities.

              Hamas disagrees with you.

            • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              Oh so you’re the leader of Hamas, I suppose?

              My calendar goes back further than October https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_rocket_attacks_on_Israel

              I see thousands upon thousands of rockets launched by Hamas at civilians in Israel.

              Hamas are a group of authoritarian goons that are paid by bitter oil-rich Arab billionaires to kill as many Jews as they can. If they stopped the money would dry up and some other group of authoritarian goons with Iranian made weapons would take their place. Their existence is dependent on hatred towards Israel, without that they wouldn’t exist.

              They aren’t the rag tag group of freedom fighters your social media feed has led you to believe. They’re genocidal psychopaths that would slit your throat in your sleep if it would benefit them.

      • Kaboom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        8 months ago

        Being real, that depends on if Hamas and Israel want it. Seeing as Hamas literally has Israel’s destruction in their charter, any ceasefire is only temporary