• gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 年前

    They still loaned him a fuck ton of money that they sure won’t ever see again. So I don’t know how they dodged a bullet.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 年前

      Chubb did a fully collateralized bond. Meaning they got something of actual value, not just trump’s word. In this case a Schawb brokerage account full of stocks and bonds for (I believe) more than the value of the bond. Plus Chubb probably added a fee on top of the value of the bond to service the transaction. When trump loses the E Jean Carroll appeal, Chubb will hand over cash and sell off the assets in the Schawb account and pocket their service fee.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 年前

        Why would they do it this way instead of just directly selling what’s in the account? I get that it takes time to unwind stuff like that, but surely it can be done in the time the judge gave?

        • obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 年前

          Taxes. If by some stroke of miracle he wins the appeal, he won’t have to pay capital gains taxes that he otherwise would have had to pay if the portfolio was liquidated.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 年前

            This. And to put numbers on it, long term cap gains taxes (for things in the account held for 2 years or more) is 20%. For short term (things in the account owned for less that 2 years) it can be as 37%. So if the account is just used as collateral, and Chubb charged a fee of less than 20% then the bond is a cheaper way to get the money for the appeal.