“Threads is deepening its ties to the fediverse, also known as the open social web, which powers services like X alternative Mastodon, Pixelfed, PeerTube, Flipboard and other apps. On Wednesday, Meta announced that users on Threads will be able to see fediverse replies on other posts besides their own. In addition, posts that originated through the Threads API, like those created via third-party apps and scheduling services, will now be syndicated to the fediverse. The latter had previously been announced via an in-app message informing users that API posts would be shared to the fediverse starting on August 28.”

  • In #Flancia we'll meet@social.coop
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    @Dirk @xelar thanks for your view, question: defederating with threads seems reasonable, but why would you defederate “second level” like this? I ask as the instance I’m in decided not to defederate with threads for now and I’m personally OK with that.

    • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      A is defederated from Threads, but federates with B. And B federates with Threads. Now Meta can cash out on your data via B.

      • smeg@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Now Meta can cash out on your data via B.

        Everything we’re posting is public, anyone can cash in on it regardless of who you defederate.

        • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          Everyone can break into my house regardless of having a key or not. I still don’t have my key delivered to them.

          • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Everyone can break into the park you visit and talk to people at

      • copygirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think that’s how it works and it would likely not be legal. By explicitly blocking Threads, you make a big statement about not wanting your instance’s posts to show up there. Also from a technical standpoint, I don’t think a “middle-man” instance will push posts from another instance to a third one. You’d have to explicitly scrape data that’s not available via the API. Please correct me if I’m wrong.

        • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Threads has about 200 million monthly users, 33 million daily users. The fediverse has just under 1 million monthly users. Do you really think that 0.5% has any relevance to Meta?

          Do you really think they would care about those users when they extend and extinguish the Fediverse?

        • Taleya@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The 0.5% on fedi are more likely to be the technical users that actually produce usable content.

          How many thread users are bots or passive consumers? They may be good for serving ads to, but they’re not so food at retaining and attracting users