Joined the Mayqueeze.
Lemmy is part of the fediverse. On the fediverse you are your own algorithm. So either you have curated your feed to be very political or you’re on the local feed of your instance, which has a lot of political posts. But you signed up there.
Either way, you’re there by choice. Curate your own feed. I get lots of stuff that isn’t political. Just keep in mind you don’t get reddit user numbers over here so not every niche nonpolitical subject has found a viable community. Yet.
Well adjusted individuals are less likely to build a murderous drug empire. I think organized crime is a little bit like politics. If you’ve made it to the top you’ve been through so much shit that you have nerves of steel and a Teflon soul. You will have found a way to deal with it or you already went swimming with the fish.
They can probably afford a real therapist out of pocket but my guess is that’s the exception rather than the rule. The inevitable influx of millennials and gen-z into crime may have driven those numbers up since Tony Soprano but still.
Yes, it’s TACO Tuesday in Teheran.
Calling it one law may have been oversimplifying it on my part. It’s more of a concert of laws and case law. Here is a summary with sources.
You’re criticizing capitalism fundamentally, which is valid. I wasn’t going that far. I didn’t think revolution was within the scope of this imaginary protest agenda we’re setting here. So baby steps. Reining in unbridled capitalism wherever possible (and necessary) is better than nothing.
As a bit of a left field addition to other good suggestions already in this thread:
Rescind the fiduciary duty of any officer in a corporation to increase shareholder value no matter what. Exceptions must be made for cases where it would hurt the environment (anywhere on the planet and judging by the strictest state laws in effect), cause excessive loss of jobs, or hurt consumers.
I think a lot of problems of late stage capitalism are downstream consequences from this stupid law.
It’s a numbers game with tight margins. Both the Lutherans and the Catholics are bleeding members and have been for a while. The difference is roughly a couple of percent. People without any religious affiliation are almost half the population.
Because it’s phrased the way the title is. Were it “Were most Nazis Catholic?” the fate would be different.
Is there something wrong with making a new account to make a discussion post about a video?
If the video is from a platform whose algorithm thrives on controversy, is presented in a context of controversy, on a new account, it’s at least suspicious here on the lemmyverse.
So you’ve been thinking about joining the fediverse but it was this video you wanted to share with us that finally made you pull the trigger? It’s a sequence of events I find inherently sus.
Is this not a forum website?
Yes, it is. And as such it is sometimes abused by people with ulterior motives.
This is ridiculous behavior.
That is both your prerogative to think so and a matter of opinion.
I’ve been respectful and open to every single person I’ve responded to. I am not creating drama or name calling.
Your eagerness to engage virtually any comment on this niche subject is what I find suspicious. It’s the eagerness you also see by people who abuse Lemmy for rage bait.
If there’s drama being created on this post, it’s because people can’t stand Mutahar. And I agree with them! But as someone who refuses to be an ideologue living in an echo chamber, I watch content from sources I don’t agree with too, and I discuss it. I don’t get what problem you have with this.
I don’t know who that is and don’t care enough to find out. I refer you to my criticism of the source of the video. My suspicion, which I have to say your comments have not diminished, is that you created this account and this persona to generate more views to feed the algorithm on YouTube and not because you wanted to have a serious discussion about the subject.
Correction: so you made a new account on this instance and then posted it.
Why would this decision require a public feedback sesh? Build it and they will come. Or they won’t because they read some stuff about the author.
I’m just spit balling here. Is it possible that the intent of this post is not to have a discussion about OSs but to boost the YouTube views? It’s just a vibe I’m getting. New account, very eager to reply, posting this out of the blue.
If the video is on YouTube, they make a thumbnail pulling a dumb face, and it gets presented in a forum like this with a whiff of controversy about it, personally, I’ll refuse to look at it.
Has there been a feature film starring somebody who came up through the influencer game that enough people here would have heard of to be able to answer this question? I can’t think of any. Can anyone else?
Talent is not necessarily a prerequisite for a long acting career. Exhibit A: Arnold Schwarzenegger. So maybe some TikTokers who act out silly mini one-person plays have a leg up on some established names in Hollywood.
Also, TV and the movie industry are in trouble. Receding commercial revenues and the age of streaming and not going to the movies are hurting them badly. Going after some influencers may be more of a fight for survival, to make money off of younger demographics, than a veritable search for acting talent.
That’s something. But I wouldn’t call that a sandwich.
Is there anything on the bread though? I was doing the mental math and I can find combos of soup with undressed bread to dip into it, tomato soup and baguette are maybe the most commonly known of the kind. But it strikes me the idea of soup and a two slices of bread with something in between is very anglosaxon, possibly more North American thing.
Stark and Wayne need to have the financial means to do their thing at that scale because they’re not magic. A mid level manager of a domino’s would be far less convincing in those roles. If you add magic to the mix, income becomes less relevant. The royal nepo god baby Thor could be dead poor as long as he had the hammer.
I’m not sure if the Equalizer franchise is based on a comic. That would be an argument for a more relatable living situation for a former super soldier who isn’t magic. He just enjoys working at a Lowe’s.
Read the forum rules.
And when you’re done with that look for a better avenue to gain traction because my guess is the Venn diagram of lemmings reading this and people who care is the smallest of slivers.
If I had money to invest and I felt disillusioned by authoritarian regimes and religious fundamentalists, I’m not sure Turkey under Erdogan is where I would put my money.
Hung around with a couple of guys from there. One of them has a mullet.
The economy in war torn Europe was shit. Even before the war ended, people traded stuff rather than currency. Like instant noodles are the de facto currency in some prisons today, nylon stockings were as good as money back then. Same with cigarettes. So if they didn’t need it to survive in the rubble, they could trade it for food with a well meaning local.
You’re asking a question and then you answer it yourself.