yet they’re still priced and treated culturally like luxury toys

  • Peter G@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You’re must be joking! Look around, if you look past the bitten apple, there are plenty of perfectly capable devices out there for under $300. In fact, I see plenty of people who are on the street corners panhandling AND using a smartphone.

  • marx2k@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    We can say the same thing about cars or any necessary manufactured good. But in every category, as with phones, cheaper models exist.

  • Square Singer@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you go for used devices, you can quite easily get an outdated entry level phone for free and a decently useable one for <€30.

    You can even get new entry level phones for as cheap as €70.

    So it’s very much a market where you can spend whatever you want.

    A flagship phone is priced like a luxurity toy, because that’s exactly what it is.

    And an entry level phone is incredibly cheap so that people who have no money can still get one. €70 with 2 years of usage is less than €3/month (realistically though, if you are in this kind of situation, you hold on to a phone for much longer).

    Over here, if you are poor enough, you’ll even get a free phone plan.

    • BruceTwarzen@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it’s actually kinda crazy what kind of new phone you can get for 200 dollars. My last phone was a 200 dollar phone that did everything my old flagship phone did. Obviously there are differences if you look deep. I talked to my friend who just bought a 1200 dollar samsung phone and said he “needs” a phone like that, because of the camera. I don’t know what that means, because he sells bread at a bakery. His camera was obviously better, but he never goes deep into his settings, like all he does is auto focus and click the button. We went on a bike ride and i’m not a picture kinda guy, i use my camara pretty much only for work related stuff and it doesn’t matter how good it is. And i showed someone a picture i took and the guy said: wow that must be a really good canera. Which kinda upset samsung guy.
      I don’t know anyone who uses their 1000 dollar phone to even a fraction of it’s capability. Now i own a nothing phone which is priced somewhere in the middle, and i like it a lot, but i wouldn’t say it’s much better than my 200 dollar phone.

      • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was selling phones back when most people thought that Internet on a cell phone was a crazy idea. Phones were advancing by leaps and bounds. The difference between a 1MP and 5MP camera was amazing.(mostly) Every year, the new version had features that last year’s wouldn’t dream of.

        Now, I’m running a five year old flagship Android, because there still won’t be much of a difference when I finally do upgrade.

        • BruceTwarzen@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          That was insane. I remember reading that 1mp cameras on phones are just years away. I was pretty excited and couldn’t believe it. Not two months later they released the first 1mp phone. And that was just the beginning.
          The only reason i buy new phones is because it gets really dusty and abused because of work and stuff. So speakers give up, too many cracks to handle and charging port malfunction. It’s nice to have a new battery as well. But these super high resolution panels with ridiculous framerates are pretty pointless. I sometimes watch halfeay through a YouTube video and don’t realize that it’s 480p. And i’m pretty picky with my computer monitor. I want my 2k and my 165fps.

          • Square Singer@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That was a crazy time.

            I still have my HTC Universal, which was an absolute flagship in 2005.

            My next phone was a Motorola Droid 3, a mit-ranger from 2011.

            If you put both of them side by side, these phones could be from different planets.

      • TwanHE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        If he doesn’t use any camera settings getting a high end phone will ofcourse give the best results for someone that just wants to point and shoot.

        But I’ve definitely seen similar reactions to pictures I took on my Poco F1 once I had a custom Gcam app well tuned. In good conditions it was close to the best phones of the time.

  • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are plenty of touch screen smartphones out there that cost like $150. The expensive ones are still the norm though because people want status symbols

  • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    If we could fight over legislations to force swappable batteries and operating systems, most people would just buy used. Like how now laptops, desktops, Raspberry Pi’s you can buy used cheap, slap a light fresh OS and go.

    • Square Singer@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      We’ll at least get swappable batteries in the EU from 2027 on. From then on it will be illegal to sell phones without swappable batteries.

  • atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    All of them aren’t. There are cheap touch screen phones. You just don’t get ridiculous features at the price point if $50. The Samsung A30 is a pretty cheap android phone.

  • MudMan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve bought people very nice phones for under $400 multiple times. Recently.

    Flagship phones are grossly overpriced. The midrange is super nice and usable these days, though. It’s a side advantage of phone tech standardizing so much. And as you said, being a necessity for daily life it’s probably okay to spend at least a few hundred on one you’re going to use for several years.

    Is this going to be another “the US has weird ideas about consumer goods” thread? Because it kinda sounds like one.

    • MimicJar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just bought a new phone (originally released in May 2023) for $170. I’ve used it for 3 days now and it works perfectly. My old phone lasted ~3-4 years and cost a similar price.

      I stopped buying “flagship” phones years ago and it’s been great. Midrange phones are absolutely the phones people should be buying.

      I also get the bells and whistles that are often missing from premium phones. I have an SD card slot for expandable storage and I have a headphone jack.

      • MudMan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, man, I switched from Samsung to Sony because they still do all those midrange phone features in a flagship container.

        I’d have gone full midrange, but I hang around mobile developers a lot and I was already getting crap for being on a four year old flagship (that was still in working order and I still use for other stuff). Now my Xperia is a conversation starter in those circles, for some reason and I still get to add storage and use my headphones and my screen has no holes in it.

  • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just like with everything else there’s a gradient of price and quality. You don’t have to buy a 1300 dollar iPhone, you could get one for only a couple hundred that would serve any use case you can think of where it would be required.

    Just because something is a necessity for daily life doesn’t mean it’s going to be cheap, it can’t just be sold below cost simply because it’s critical.

  • 0ops@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can get good condition, used, last year flagships on eBay and Swappa all day long. I’ve literally never bought a brand new phone.

  • Mr_nutter_butter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    A mate of mine has a keyboard flip phone and it’s amazing full qwerty keyboard dude can type wicked quick on that thing compared to touch screens

  • regbin_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Uhh no? They’ve gotten really cheap nowadays.

    $300 gets you a 5G capable phone with a high refresh OLED and a processor fast enough to play resource intensive games like Genshin Impact.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You could argue that’s a definition of success for a gadget: when it is ubiquitous and necessary.

    Time to get in on some new gadget that will soon be a boring ordinary part of life. Electric Vehicles look like they will but still pretty expensive. My vote is home automation stuff

    • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Electric Vehicles look like they will but still pretty expensive.

      Expensive and impractical at the moment due to the lack of charging stations.

      My vote is home automation stuff

      I kinda hope not. I don’t need even more devices listening in on me.

      • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Most charging happens at home. There are still some hurdles, but lack of charging stations is not the argument against mass adoption of EVs that you think it is.

        Sadly I can’t find any hard numbers but this report states “The project shed light on other facets of PEV use. It found that public and workplace charging infrastructure enabled drivers to increase their electric driving range, although most drivers did not charge away from home frequently”

        edit: nevermind, there is another report that states “According to the U.S. Department of Energy, 80 percent of EV charging happens at home”

        • JStenoien@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          And how many people do you think live in apartments/rentals that cannot just install a charging station at home?

      • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have VR and I don’t see how that would ever reach mass adoption. I think it will forever be a toy for people interested in techy stuff, and only be a tool for very specific jobs.

        It’s just not really useful in any meaningful way to most people. Why would I replace a regular monitor with VR if all I do is organize spreadsheets and write emails?

        • Case@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve got the hardware to use VR on my gaming rig.

          But between the entry cost for the actual VR equipment, and the sheer lack of games that look interesting I don’t see the point in it.

          Then again, the lack of games that look interesting isn’t just a VR problem - to me at least.

          Repeating patterns of slight upgrades to visuals, mechanics I grew bored of a decade ago, etc.

          I used to rip on Madden/FIFA/Sports games in general for that crap, but it seems to be the trend.

          That being said, I’ve felt jaded about games since I was a teen, and that was a long time ago, but there was always something to keep my attention.

          Don’t really have any other majornhobbies though, so I’m at a bit of an impasse on that subject. I do spend more time with my wife though, lol.

  • elscallr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

    Our devices are old hat now. They’re part of our life. Even people who don’t understand them have a vague idea how they work.

    They used to be like magic. Now we are desperate for new magic.