• FridaySteve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    A handful of ultra-rich people would lose a little bit of power and their entire social structure would collapse. That country won’t open back up without tremendous suffering, especially as long as the rich people in power stay rich and powerful by keeping things the way they are.

    Similar to everywhere else.

    • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yup. If red, brown, and cash fascism are all focused on extorting the many while benefiting the elite through corruption and repression, then is capitalism really a way to improvement?

  • garth@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Since the mid-20th century, North Korea’s domestic politics have centered on the idea that the whole world is out to get them, and therefore they must be fiercely independent from outside influence. Openly asking for international aid would be like admitting defeat against all their political enemies, real and imagined. Nobody in power is going to do that.

    • ruuster13@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      11 hours ago

      This. Their entire system of authoritarian control depends on it. The people are brainwashed into believing it’s true and if cracks start to appear in the facade, the government could (and definitely would for NK) quickly lose control of the people. The regime would be toppled.

      • TachyonTele@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Are civilians really brainwashed and think it’s true though? Or are they just like regular people and deal with it while getting through the daily grind?

        • Eldritch@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Out of sight out of mind. It’s why authoritarian governments police speech and media. If you control what they see and hear. Then the worst that could happen is they might just feel that something is off. But have no evidence to necessarily back that up. Basically an echo chamber of the size of the nation.

        • ruuster13@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The authoritarian ruler maintains control when enough people are brainwashed. See the current situation in the USA as an example. It’s not necessarily even the majority, but enough to maintain and enforce power.

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          There is a large amount of state propaganda using the conflict as justification for the state’s existence. I would imagine whether people believe to be true or not to be on a spectrum line other countries.

      • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Not that I support the DPRK, but considering the massive rise of fascism, I don’t think it’s anywhere near ‘wrong’ to consider capitalism a danger.

        I criticise the DPRK for its horrific repression, but considering what capitalism in the US has brought, it is naïve to assume the US is all benevolent.

        • ruuster13@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Capitalism is economic policy, not a governance system. You are committing the gravest sin leftists struggle with by conflating it with a power structure. They are not the same thing. Capitalism is not actually practiced anywhere in the world now, as oligarchy is the norm. The whole “capitalism vs socialism” argument has been conflated and abused to drive a wedge between Democrats and leftists in the USA.

          • rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            That’s total nonsense. Socialism and capitalism are both economic, and economics are tightly integrated into governance. To divide the two so wholly is a fool’s errand. The difference between the two lies in who owns the factories and fields. If the factories and fields are privately owned, it’s capitalism. The US has been practicing capitalism since before the declaration of independence was even written. Capitalism is also an inherent hierarchical power structure.

            Oligarchy is a political form of governance, not an economic model. Oligarchy can exist in several economic models, but let’s focus on how we got oligarchs in this capitalist system. They were created by exploiting the labor of the working class to earn their wealth, but being rich isn’t enough to them. They use their money to buy power, and then leverage that power to increase their wealth.

          • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            It’s not as though that power structure behind the economic system is leveraged to dismantle and destroy competing economic systems or labor rights or anything. Yeah, totally and completely separate and never the twain shall meet. The CIA definitely didn’t use economic terrorism to force countries to submit to US cartels business demands.

            Nothing has ever happened, like say, the US corporations using their wealth to dominate the court systems and laws of other counties to do something like put media “pirates” calling themselves “The Pirate Bay” in prison for things that were legal in their own country to enforce the US’s own draconian capitalistic IP laws.

            What an absolute crock of shit dude get a grip. Capitalism is oligarchy by any other name.

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Maybe, but the DPRK government is on its third generation hereditary leader with a senior leadership consisting of children of previous senior leadership. It is functionally an absolute monarchy.

          • Taalnazi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            I suppose they meant the fascists or liberals who think the US at some point ever really was benevolent.

            IMHO, the closest it came was during Teddy Roosenvelt’s trust busting campaign, but still. The US is a capitalist project through and through. Being well-off I refuse to finance such a project. We shall crush capitalism through itself.

  • IWW4@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 hours ago

    NK is run by A Supreme Leader Kim Jung Un.

    Kim’s title is Supreme Leader and he is a brutal dictator who was raised and educated in Switzerland. He is at least 100 pounds overweight and has everything he could ever want. The only help he wants is figuring out who in his government is a threat to his power. Kim once had a political opponent killed by having him shot with an anti-aircraft gun.

    Kim has 30 millions slaves who provide Kim and the ruling class with everything they want.

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Because that would result in regime change. The interests of the rulers and the interests of the country are not aligned.

  • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It’s been a while, but there used to be a joke that whenever NK needed an aid package, they would fire off a missile. This was in the years before the world went bugfuck right wing crazy

  • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    It’s simple, the people who need help are not in charge. Those who are in control, benefit from the horrible situation they put everyone else through. The entire country thinks the kims are gods.

    Edit: not the entire country but that’s the dogma and it’s heavily enforced.

  • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It’d open the floodgates for “”“aid”“” that actually aims to put up a far-right capitalist dictatorship.

    Socialist states only take aid from other socialist states and stateless communist societies.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    the ones in power are probably quite well off there, so from their point of view the country would be working perfectly.