“But it also takes a lot of energy to train a human,” Altman said. “It takes like 20 years of life and all of the food you eat during that time before you get smart. And not only that, it took the very widespread evolution of the 100 billion people that have ever lived and learned not to get eaten by predators and learned how to figure out science and whatever, to produce you.”
So in his view, the fair comparison is, “If you ask ChatGPT a question, how much energy does it take once its model is trained to answer that question versus a human? And probably, AI has already caught up on an energy efficiency basis, measured that way.”


The humans still exist and need food, even if they are replaced by chatbots in the workforce. The comparison is therefore useless, unless you plan to murder the unemployed.
Well, that’s precisely what some of the Trump-aligned fascists are suggesting on live television.
What the shit
Also
as opposed to voluntary?? He’s trying to soften the language by adding that (totally redundant) extra adjective to remove focus from the ‘lethal’ part
A modest proposal
I don’t but the police work for me since I am a billionaire and they can murder the unemployed for me!
but PER QUESTION how many kilowatt hours are they using. not just in their heads, in their hearts and in their booties.
Plan is obvious… to me. Why not so to everybody else
To save the working man, you’ve got to put him out to pasture