• hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Yes. And mathematics. And a key figure in the scientific revolution. Probably also one of the most intelligent people ever.

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Possible. But then we’d need somebody else to develop calculus and write a Principia Mathematica and lay the groundworks for the age of enlightenment.

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Much of the Special Relativity value was on Lorenz mechanics anyway.

        And General Relativity, the Photoelectric Effect explanation, and his explanation for the Brownian movement all needed a great deal of anti-establishment thinking… honestly, I have no idea how much Newton had of that.

        • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          General Relativity needed lots and lots of the math that has been developed after Newton, even shortly before Einstein (and also he himself has developed some of it).

      • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I firmly believe Newton would have gotten to relativity before Einstien if he were born at the same time.

        But it wasn’t the end results and complex formulas of Einstein’s theory that showed the flaws and gaps in Newton’s mechanics.

        It was the basic questions and thought experiments in Einstein’s first script. About basic geometry, length and width. The flow of time, the speed of a signal. Concurrency.

        It should have been possible to think these thoughts at Newton’s time.

          • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Mercury’s orbit

            I wasn’t talking about Astronomy at all.

            Lorentz transformation

            That was needed only for the end results. Not in the introductory thoughts that I was talking about.

            Fizeau’s experiment, the fact that the speed of light is the same

            Good point here. That was in fact one of the starting points for Einstein.

            There was no way special relativity could’ve been found even half a century earlier

            Again you are looking at the end results only, when the theory was complete.

            Have you even read my comment?

            Have you even read Einstein?

  • spittingimage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    The dude contributed greatly to physics, optics and mathematics.

    He also tried to cure the plague with magic frog vomit.

  • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    physics jesus

    Yes, he is still regarded as such. Nearly nobody is aware of how thoroughly his core statements in physics have been refuted since 1905.

    His math holds water.