• FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Low 6 figure is the minimum required to have a middle class lifestyle for one person (not a family) in California. And when I say middle class lifestyle, I mean not having to worry about bills, but still not able to buy a house or a new car without decades of saving or massive debt. Maybe you can afford a vacation once a year if you haven’t had any unexpected medical problems.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Especially when you factor in the cost of living in places where $100k jobs are to be found. “Six figures” may sound like a fortune if you’re sitting in rural Ohio but it’s little more than a decent wage in Seattle.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Yeah. The problem is that the goalposts keep getting pushed away faster than income is keeping up. Someone might have what is considered a good paying job, but the buying power for major purchases like cars and homes keeps taking hits. On top of that the bills get steeper and steeper. Six figures should be a fortune.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      You can’t afford to buy a single family home on $100k/yr in my area. So I’m not sure it really meets the classic definition of middle class anymore.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Middle class didn’t mean a big McMansion or desirable area. It meant a modest house in a small lot in a boring suburb of someplace like Detroit where you’d work for Ford or something.

        Our ideas of what kind of house we should have is really distorted. It’s like pickup trucks. What was considered an everyday pickup 40 years ago was 1/3rd the size of the behemoths available today, and of course today’s trucks cost $80,000 compared to the $6,500 of something like a ‘85 Toyota Pickup ($20k in today dollars).

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          Show me the place where you can both earn the $100k AND afford the homes. Places with higher wages also have higher costs. It doesn’t help someone in Seattle to tell them go buy a home in Oklahoma.

          • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            There’s quite a few major cities in the US where houses are averaging around 300k which a 100k salary would easily cover the purchase of. Pittsburg, Detroit, Philadelphia, Milwaukee, Madison, Minneapolis, Indianapolis, St Louis for examples just off the top of my head. And if you look in rural areas between these major cities you can easily snag a 100k home so if you ever find yourself burnt out from your high paying career there’s that option too

            • scarabic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              45 minutes ago

              Sure but that doesn’t say anything about the wages there. How many $100k jobs am I going to find in Milwuakee and Detroit? I work in tech so I can tell you now the answer is close to zero.

              This source says that median household income in Pittsburgh is in the low $60ks. And while housing costs are 2% below national average, utility costs are 20% above national average 🤷‍♂️

        • Yes… but you have to choose more slum-y areas. And if you have kids, they’re gonna get buillied so much.

          Source, I am that kid. Moved from Brooklyn to Philly, sure, housing was more affordable, but school ratings went from 8/10 to like a 3/10. Such hell.

            • Ninjasftw@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 day ago

              The thing is though that unless you have a fully remote job you are probably not going to stay earning 100k in colarado springs

            • Soggy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              There’s the additional cost that my whole family and all my friends live in the “Greater Seattle area” where housing is outrageous and climbing. If I were to move somewhere more affordable it would mean losing my entire social support system.

            • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 day ago

              Cmon, you can’t cherry pick a house and say “just uproot your entire life, there are cheaper houses out there!”

              Schools, job market, support system and more all play a huge part. It isn’t as simple as “just move.”

              • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                21 hours ago

                Keep in mind you’re replying to a literal Nazi, they don’t do much arguing in good faith.