Why do cell phones have a data limit but home internet doesn’t? I understand bandwidth limits, but how can home internet get away with giving users all the data they can use, but cell phone providers can’t?

  • cerement@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 month ago

    cell phone providers can, they just won’t (would eat into their profits)

    and most of the home internet sold as “unlimited” was a scam – if you started to get too close to some hidden value, they would start throttling your connection

  • mvirts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    My home Internet charges extra when I use more than 1 TB per month. Not sure but I think it’s metered both up and down.

    • Kaiyoto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      I remember Comcast suddenly started enforcing a limit of about 1 TB some years ago when I had them. Realized it happened when I renewed my contract to get a lower price again for a promotional period. Apparently I agreed to a new contract or something that included the new limit. >:|

        • sneaky@r.nf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          30 days ago

          I currently have that cap and wondering how I will be able to play MSFS2024 under these conditions. Absolute trash they get to enforce this.

          • Scolding7300@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            29 days ago

            Had the same thought, and a rep already told me I’m 200gb away. Let’s hope some of the stuff is cached.

            Just try to pnpy so flights at 30k ft or above so you don’t have to load ground textures lol

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    30 days ago

    AT&T asks the same question. They provide the bold option to pay more than the competition and get data limits on your home internet.

  • Sigilos@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    Not all home internet is unlimited. In many US rural areas, home internet connections have a monthly cap just like mobile networks do. A higher cap costs more, if it’s available at all.

    • sawdustprophet@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      In many US rural areas, home internet connections have a monthly cap

      And suburban, and urban. I’ve never lived anywhere that didn’t have a cap.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      And not all cell service is limited. I switched from cable to 5G fixed wireless, because I was tired of having a data cap. It’s faster and cheaper too.

  • Surp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    Caps are fake there’s no need for them besides to build golden marble pillars outside CEOs mega mansions.

  • over_clox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Umm, my home internet has a 50GB per month limit. Can’t complain much though, it’s cheap at literally $1 a day, and I’m not a gamer or online streamer.

      • over_clox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        I do browse through YT videos, but I don’t bother watching full length movies. Honestly, I’ve lost interest in watching newer movies, seems like a waste of time to me. However, I do enjoy educational and scientific content.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      That’s more than $1.50 per Gigabyte.
      When you download a game from Steam, most games you literally pay more for the data than for the game.
      Even when you pirate, you pay like $15 for a BluRay quality movie

      • over_clox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        You’d be dumbfounded to see what I’ve been able to accomplish using my connection. Terabytes of games archived, I just didn’t have to download nor upload them myself.

    • golli@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      How is 1€/day cheap for such limited home Internet? I guess it might depend on where you are, but unless you are in the middle of nowhere that seems expensive.

      Here in Germany for example, which really isn’t known for its cheap internet, I can find options that offer 100Mbit Flatrates for 20€/month.

      • njordomir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        My German friends and family don’t believe me when I tell them how expensive internet and phone is in the US. They all think it’s expensive in Germany. Having said that, there are some big differences in take home pay.

      • over_clox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I ain’t even talking about the internet speed, I’m talking about the data cap. And $1 a day is about as cheap as it gets in my area.

        • nimpnin@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          as cheap as it gets in my area

          That’s not a very good approach to assess prices

    • Atemu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      For ~$30 a month, that’s a complete and utter rip-off.

      Even here in Neuland Germany you get at least decent internet with no caps for that price.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      30 days ago

      Good thing, because some games would take up all of that just to download and install.

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      30 days ago

      Found the American. In France that would be a huge ripoff compared to what the other providers have to offer. Like, literally any VDSL offer is around 30€/month (or under) and no caps

  • WxFisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    In theory at least it’s because you pay for a specific bandwidth for home internet (the size of the pipe) but a specific amount of data for cellular (how much stuff you can get through a fixed sized pipe).

    Home internet is a little unique in that way, almost all other utilities are consumption based with no real tiers in terms of how it’s delivered (you pay for the volume of water or gas you use, electricity is the same, just different units).

    Networking equipment gets more expensive based on the bandwidth it supports, but it doesn’t much care how many bits you push through it. So ISPs charge based on their capacity to deliver those bits, and provide tiers at different price points. Cellular though is much more bandwidth constrained due to the technologies (and it used to be much more so before LTE and 5G), so it didn’t makes sense to charge you for slow or slower tiers. Instead the limiting factor is the capacity of a tower so by limiting data to small amounts it naturally discourages use. That model carried forward even now that the technologies support broadband speeds in some cases. As such and ISP could provide the biggest pipe (highest speed) to all homes and just charge based on consumption (they used to in the days of dial up, and satellite before starlink always has). Many ISPs instead are now double dipping though and charging for both.

  • eldavi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    money.

    data caps are coming to home internet soon too and with inescapable hidden contracts; switch to an independent isp to avoid it before you’re entrapped into one.

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        they exist and they usually suck compared to something like comcast or at&t; but they’re much better than a $500 internet bill because you went over your limit or paying considerably more for breaking the contract that you didn’t know you signed when you didn’t read the fine print.

          • eldavi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            i’m aware and fwiw; that’s where it’ll be implemented last since the people there are the biggest and best chance at pushing back against this successfully.

  • I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    For cell / mobile phones, you’re sharing the capacity of the cell among multiple people.

    In this example, a rural cell tower can provide up to 395Mbps.

    It would only take 40 people watching Kayo at high definition (or any high definition video service) via their phone or a 4G router to saturate this tower.

    For everyone else at this time, it’ll still work but even though they might have a strong radio signal (lots of bars), the internet will become slow.

    Limiting monthly usage, or charging more for more data per month, reduces the risk of saturation.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      There aren’t going to be 40 people using that tower if it’s truly a rural tower. If it isn’t a rural tower then they can update it to handle more throughput. The issue isn’t the towers, it’s the companies wanting to keep using old tech to squeeze out as much profit as possible.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Both of you can be correct. The policy is prevalent to squeeze money out of consumers. However, it’s also easy to imagine more than 40 people in a rural area using their phones for media purposes during PM times in 2024. There’s less to do, internet availability might not exist for some or all residents, and people use their phone for everything now. Casting from a phone is a larger percent of viewing TV now.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          In a rural area the population density is a lot less than that of suburbs or the city. We’re talking about 40 people or less using a single tower, this also takes in account of the 3 carriers. If each carriers tower can handle 40 people, that’s potentially 120 users total in a few mile radius, which is normal for rural populations.

          • I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            This tower has about a 20km radius on average due to topography, covers a stretch of the New England Highway and also covers the nearby village of Black Mountain. A good few hundred phones will be in range I expect.

            The tower also has cells for Optus and Vodafone, but they are a significant minority of customers in this area.

            • SupraMario@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              30 days ago

              This sounds like an issue with the carriers not actually putting in more towers to properly handle the load though. Aka greed.

  • brap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I guess it depends what country you’re in. I don’t have limits on either and don’t want to imagine having that concern.

    • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      The first time I saw a mobile plan without any limits was somewhere around 2003-2004. Pretty soon after that, all the competitors started offering similar plans. So glad we got rid of those stupid limits.

    • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      I moved to Telus when Rogers bought Shaw and screwed up my billing plan, and were unwilling to be competitive.

      Both Rogers and Telus have capped plans and more expensive “unlimited” plans.

  • teuto@lemmy.teuto.icu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I have the opposite. Unlimited phone data, but it throttles above some high number that I’ve never hit. Capped home internet from crapcast, 1.3 TB, I haven’t hit it but I’ve come within a couple gigabytes.

    They offer unlimited data if I use their modem/router for an extra $10/mo. Of course their modem comes with the wonderful feature of a public hotspot for any other Comcast customers in the area. I’ve been thinking about getting their modem, putting it in a metal box and just using pass through with my opnsense box.