cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/42834907

“The reason we’re here is because the government of the United States wants you to leave the United States,” Judge Ubaid ul-Haq, presiding from a courtroom on Varick Street, told a group of about a dozen children on a recent morning on Webex.

The parties included a 7-year-old boy, wearing a shirt emblazoned with a pizza cartoon, who spun a toy windmill while the judge spoke. There was an 8-year-old girl and her 4-year-old sister, in a tie-dye shirt, who squeezed a pink plushy toy and stuffed it into her sleeve. None of the children were accompanied by parents or attorneys, only shelter workers who helped them log on to the hearing.

Immigrant advocates and lawyers say an increasing number of migrant children are making immigration court appearances without the assistance of attorneys, which they say will lead to more children getting deported.

“That child will be ordered deported from this country — that could all happen without that child ever speaking with an attorney and given the opportunity to obtain representation,” Shah said. “The cruelty is really apparent to all of us out here in the field.”

holy shit

  • Pauce@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 minutes ago

    I feel crazy when I read these kinds of articles over the past few months, because I’ll have a flash back to a few years ago where the exact same shit went down. And here they go again, this time cranked to 11. The show Orange is The New Black dedicated a whole subplot in their final season back in 2019 on how ICE was operating and what they were pulling. Immigration raids disguised as police raids, the indefinite detention of nonviolent migrants, inhumane conditions in holding, insufficient medical care/attention, etc.

    One scene later in the season depicts the article above exactly, a group of children being put before a judge that they couldn’t understand for many reasons; lack of representation, the language barrier, or because the kid is all of 2 years old.

  • Hupf@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    50 minutes ago

    The dystopia isn’t even boring anymore.

    Actual orphan crushing machine.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Judge: I will help you since you have no lawyer.

    4 year old girl: No habla Engles

    following translated:

    Judge: Where were you born?

    girl: I don’t remember. I was too young.

    Judge: If you show me a US birth certificate or SS ID card, I can help you not be deported.

    girl: uhhh… what? what is words?

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      33 minutes ago

      SS ID card

      This invokes some unpleasant aSSociations.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Maybe if these KIDS didn’t WANT to be in Court they SHOULDNT have Committed CRIMES!

    -Republicans who Voted for the 34 FELONIES Candidate!

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why are they spending time in a courtroom when they could be in the mines?

    • toiletobserver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      75
      ·
      1 day ago

      They can preside over it, but they should just have dismissed the case with prejudice for the government not providing a lawyer.

      • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        64
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Unfortunately the law does not obligate the govt to provide a lawyer.

        Edit: In immigration court. This is not a criminal court.

        Edit edit: The number of people unable to comprehend the difference is giving me insight into just how bad the education system is in the states.

        Edit edit edit: Apparently me explaining the facts of the matter makes me a bad guy 🤦

        • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          16 hours ago

          You are correct, and ultimately the issue is that the laws shouldn’t be different for immigration courts or immigration agents, because wrongful detention or deportation can be worse than wrongful imprisonment.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          1 day ago

          Funny you should say that…

          I would read the bill of rights. It is very important to know as a US citizen.

          • andros_rex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            16 hours ago

            In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

            I emphasized the key word there. There is no guarantee in civil or other courts (which sucks - try finding a divorce lawyer once your ex saps the bank account lol).

          • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            This is about IMMIGRATION court. They are not US citizens, and the constitution specifically states the right to an attorney is only for CRIMINAL court, which this is not.

            • iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              24 hours ago

              My own reading of that amendment is that it puts requirements on the US government, period. It does not limit things to US citizens.

              Of course, I know that’s not the way the courts interpret the amendment. 😔

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Because if you do you will probably be killed or sent to El Salvador. Unless most people are doing it, nobody wants to take that risk.

          • oppy1984@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Technically it was the British who burned the White House, but it was done in retaliation for an attack on British Canada.

            • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 hours ago

              I feel like that’s pedantic in a similar way to saying technically it wasn’t Americans who declared independence

              • oppy1984@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Wait I think you just accidentally agreed with me. If the British declared independence from Britain in order to become Americans, then it was British troops who attacked D.C. those troops were just stationed in Canada when the attack took place.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    they did this in his first term. this is part of why he was elected. racists vote.

  • aramis87@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m just going to point out that Trump has declared that the official language of the United States is English, so I’m sure he’s going to put in another executive order saying there shouldn’t be any translators made available.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    It is from the old FBI/NSA Playbook. Put them in “court” but then make sure they have no representation as that would get in the way of the ruling.