If you truly love your partner, does a ring and a ceremony really do anything?

I know there are certain legal situations where an official marriage changes who has certain rights, but aren’t those same rights available if you make other legally-official decisions E.G. a will or trusts, etc?

I’m generally curious why people get married beyond the “because I love them” when it costs so much money.

  • neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 minutes ago

    It can be very, very inexpensive for the costs of a court filing fee and a friend getting an online certification to officiate the wedding.

    You get tax breaks while married, and a lot of things in life are easier when you’re married and sharing the same living space, bills, etc. The world has been built to make it more economical and easier.

    It’s the getting divorced that’s expensive and sucks. As long as you can avoid doing that, or have a prenup in place, you’re good.

  • vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I’m generally curious why people get married beyond the “because I love them” when it costs so much money.

    Getting married doesn’t have to cost virtually anything. Really just the application fee to get a marriage license. The specific price will vary by state, and even by county (within the US, not sure how it works outside). Where I live, you can go to a courthouse and get married for $35.

    If you plan to have kids, there are a lot of legal reasons why it’s just a lot simpler to have kids. The same applies without them, to a lesser degree, but with kids it’s just so much more of a hassle to not be married.

    You’re right that you can achieve most (maybe even all?) legal benefits of marriage through trusts, wills, etc. But that’s a hell of a lot more work, and the lawyer fees, filing fees, and application fees are almost certainly going to cost you more than a cheap courthouse marriage. Not to mention the added work for yourself.

    Beyond all that, though, the single biggest reason I wanted to get married and have a wedding with lots of friends and family was to stand up in front of everyone and profess my love for my (now) wife, let her do the same for me, then have big party with all our friends and family to celebrate it. There’s nothing wrong with spending money to throw a party for something you want to celebrate.

    • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      56 minutes ago

      Neither my wife nor I wanted kids but we still got married. The legal aspects you touch on are pretty darned important even without kids in the picture. Health/medical reasons are another huge one. We have a friend who lived with her partner for decades, but never got married. When he fell ill and was hospitalized it was virtually impossible for her to make any decisions, tell the doctors what his wishes were, etc. All because they weren’t legally married.

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    60 minutes ago

    Getting legally married is intended to protect the couple under certain circumstances as you suggest. You could attempt to perform the same with other legal means but it would be harder and costlier; like you deciding not buying a car but putting one together yourself.

    The notion people get legally married out of love or worse that “a paper does not say I can love a person” seem to just have a 7 year old notion of what marriage is

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    43 minutes ago

    Depending on state, healthcare applies to spouses but may not for long term partners. You can’t do that with a will or trust

    You also get tax benefits

    Getting married should only be expensive if you want it to be, although too many people fall for the peer pressure.

    • For me I was overwhelmingly in love, ready to declare it to the world and willing to pay anything for the one big party of my life. That may not have entirely worked out, but was how I felt at the time
    • My best friend just got married for reasonable cost. Still had a big party, but it was 40 people in a park, and we went to a restaurant after.
    • Another friend got married inexpensively, maybe. Was it the $100 actual cost, or do you count the week in Vegas?
  • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I want someone to marry me again someday. I want someone to stand in front of my friends and family and profess their love and devotion.

    I gave up on that dream a couple of years ago.

  • 93maddie94@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I didn’t do the marriage thing because of love. I don’t need a piece of paper to tell me that. I did it for the logistical stuff. Buying a house. Having a kid. Combining finances. Life insurance. Health insurance. While all of this could be possible without being married, it’s much easier to have a marriage certificate than to try to prove to everyone all the time that we’re partners. If my husband were in the hospital on life support, being next of kin would simplify so many things. My culture is designed in a way that traditional marriage shapes so many processes. There may be workarounds, but they’re not always simplified and most people may not know how to use them. That can take valuable time that you don’t always have.

  • Pencilnoob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    A wedding can cost almost nothing. I found a very small local poor church and offered them $100 bucks to use the place on a Saturday. I baked a big cake, decorated it plain white. I overnight smoked a brisket, made a pan of Mac and cheese.

    Got a friend to officiate, and told our friends and families a month in advance. We told everyone it was a potluck. We got $100 plain rings. My grandmother ended up buying some cool flowers for decorations. A friend played some music on the church speakers.

    All in, it probably cost us $400 out of pocket, and we got enough cash from attendees to cover that and pay for us to take off work for the week to just hang out and move in together, staycation style. To be fair, I don’t think either of us would have wanted a vacation style honeymoon, we did that kind of thing later. That first week was a lot of figuring out how to live together, so that took time.

    So it’s possible to have a big party with friends and family, but spend very little. Just have everyone bring some food and it’ll work out.

    Studies show that folks are less likely to have a happy long term marriage the more they spend on a wedding. It’s a pretty clear correlation that expensive weddings typically make folks more unhappy and starts the relationship off with more financial stress. So, don’t feel bad about being frugal! As long as you are both happy, it can be very inexpensive.

  • kambusha@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Marriage? Why, it’s the greatest weapon in any noble’s arsenal! Let me enlighten you on matters of state and power.

    Marriage isn’t about love; that’s a peasant’s fantasy. For those of us who bear the weight of ancient houses, marriage is statecraft of the highest order.

    When I wed the second daughter of House Tyrell, I gained three castles along the Roseroad and secured my southern border against those Dornish vipers. Her father’s bannermen now answer my call; five thousand spears when winter comes.

    Marriage binds blood to blood. When your wife bears your children, you’ve created heirs that unite two powerful lineages. Should some upstart lord challenge either house, they face the combined might of both.

    Consider the Lannisters and their gold. A prudent marriage there secures not just coin for your depleted coffers, but access to their formidable fleet. Or perhaps the Arryns, whose impregnable Eyrie would shield your lands from eastern invaders.

    Politics shifts like quicksand, but marriage creates bonds that even the most treacherous lords hesitate to break. The realm notices when sacred vows are betrayed, and remembers.

    So you ask what’s the point? Power, lands, armies, legitimacy, and the future of your house. What greater purpose exists for those of us born to rule?

    Now pass the wine. These matters of dynasty have made my throat dry.

  • wolfylow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Marriage wasn’t important to me, either - I was with my now husband for many years before we tied the knot. I’d never been one for the traditional big wedding, wasn’t sure what difference it would make, etc.

    What changed? My Mum died - and in all the times at hospital and then dealing with the funeral etc - I realised just how important being “next of kin” actually is. In so many ways. And while you can cover most of your bases with various legal documents - honestly there’s already a super easy way, that is very well understood all over the world, that achieves this.

    And while I wasn’t expecting it to feel any different afterwards, it really did - for both of us. More certainty and just really solid.

    • flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Glad you mentioned ‘next of kin.’ This is the important answer. If you’re married, you can do all that important legal stuff- make medical decisions if your partner is unconscious or indisposed, get the death certificate if that happens and give it to all the people who will need it.

      Say your partner is in a car accident and you go to the hospital. There’s no marriage, no forms, no nothing to indicate you’re at all related to this person. You’re just some dude or lady, showing up at some dude or lady’s bedside. You can’t make the decisions for this person. Even if, say, they have a horrible narcissistic mother they’re estranged from- that mother, just by being the mother, can get all the authority to make decisions your unconscious partner would hate!

      (Drawing from my own life. Fuck my mother.)

      You can’t even call the hospital and get information on them. If they aren’t awake to indicate a release of information, the hospital can’t let you see them, can’t tell you anything.

      This is just the first example that came to mind. The purpose of marriage is, it’s a legal way to indicate that you’re the most important person in the life of the person you marry. (And yes, depending on where you are and laws in your state or country or whatever, domestic partnership and other stuff can grant that, too.)

    • 𝕱𝖎𝖗𝖊𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Marriage isn’t necessary for a lot of those. A domestic partnership is a lot easier and can get you couples rights, health insurance, life insurance, and visa. Country dependent of course.

      I personally don’t intend on getting married since I hate that it’s a religious practice enshrined in law. But between common law/domestic partnership, we don’t need to.

      • brewbart@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        Deutsch
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Actually, marriage is one of the founding circumstances why we actually have laws. Although it is reasonable to assume that every marriage ritual in early societies had some kind of ‘blessed be this couple’ aspect, it originated out of civil necessity (structuring inheritance) before the Jesus Club took over and changed the meaning

      • vzq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That really depends on your jurisdiction. There are places where domestic partners have a different status. Mostly because of the long arm of the Catholic Church.

  • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Getting married doesn’t have to cost a lot of money, if a couple chooses to spend a lot on their wedding they’re doing it for that sake, but it’s not necessary.

  • illi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The point is the legal benefits and publicly declaring your love and commitment, if you care about that.

    You can spend as little as you want, if you only care about the legal status. But since you are probably asking about the usual big wedding - it’s really just throwing a party to celebrate the act. It’s not mandatory. Invite people you want to party with and celebrate life in a way you want.

    What can suck about it is the peer pressure from parents and other people to do it the way they want, to do it “properly”.

  • Vinny_93@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    I didn’t get married for the love or the religious reasons, it’s just way easier when you buy a house together. Now, if I die, all my stuff automatically belongs to my wife.

    We got married on a Tuesday morning at the municipal building at 8:30 making it free. The only thing we spent money on was the rings.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 hours ago

      What town is this where everybody gets free Tuesday morning weddings?

      Not that I need another one, it just seems to be happening a lot in here

      • Vinny_93@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 hours ago

        This was Meppel but every municipality in the Netherlands has a free marriage half hour. It varies what day it is but it’ll usually be early morning.

      • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Most municipalities in the Netherlands have one morning per week for free marriages. Not always tuesday though.

    • Noerknhar@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      That actually depends on the country. In Germany, as an example, it doesn’t automatically go to your wife - you still have to declare that in your will.

      • Vinny_93@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 hours ago

        We have the option. If you get married you can get married in ‘(beperkte) gemeenschap van goederen’, which means ‘what’s mine is yours’. Caveat is that anything you owned before you got married will not be taken into account.

        Then there’s ‘huwelijkse voorwaarden’ which means ‘what’s mine is mine’.

        • Noerknhar@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Same here, but for us, it is a common misconception that this also is for when one dies. Crazy system if you ask me because totally unintuitive.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Aight, you seem to want to ignore the legal benefits, so I won’t mention that beyond saying that it is a hell of a lot easier to get married than to figure out all the paperwork needed to duplicate it, and not even have the exact same outcomes, just the majority. The tax thing, for example, you can’t file jointly if you aren’t married, no matter what else you set up (edit: in places where things like common law marriage aren’t recognized)

    The biggest thing is the experience, imo. The memory.

    Now, me and my wife went to the JoP, with our kid and required witnesses (my best friend and his husband).

    No fancy reception, no major party, just went home and said to my dad “we’re back, no problems.” He said congratulations, and went back to watching TV.

    Total spent was about a hundred bucks, including gas. And the memories of it are wonderful, we cherish it all, and we’re happy as hell we didn’t do anything else.

    Wedding ceremonies, however, are expensive once you go beyond that bare minimum. That’s a cultural/sociological thing where the needs of the individual and the culture mesh into not only believing it necessary, but beneficial.

    And, for the people that want it, it is beneficial. Ceremonies, rites, rituals, they serve a purpose beyond the legal or official status that comes with them. Weddings are as much about community as they are the couple. It’s the union being both recognized and celebrated at the same time, even when it’s a secular ceremony rather than religious.

    Don’t get me wrong, the money spent on empty bullshit surrounding weddings is absurd. But the actual wedding, where the community stands around the couple is incredibly powerful in terms of validation, even when it’s the license that really matters legally. You can have ceremonies without the license; I performed several of them back before same sex marriage became legal. Those events were important, and doubly so because they had no legal standing.

    I think that’s what you’re missing, that there’s a massive difference between two people shacking up and marriage. When the people involved swear an oath, and/or exchange symbols of union it means something, even if there’s no witnesses, not even someone to perform a ceremony. But as you move into witnesses and an officiant, it feels different because it is a public commitment. You can still divorce or whatever, but it happened, and you can never deny that. That moment, the vows, they exist in a way they don’t if you swear only to each other.

    Yeah, two people can be just as committed, and honor their commitment perfectly without anything else. But it feels different.

    Now, again, I’d argue that once you start shelling out for crazy dresses and cake and niche receptions, you hit diminishing returns very quick. That’s to satisfy other things, not the union itself. It may well make people happy, but it doesn’t add anything to the underlying point of there being a ceremony in the first place. That of saying to the world “where once there were two, now there are one”.

    Not that anyone has to share the valuation, but it’s what underlies the whole thing, and it has value

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The tax thing, for example[:] you can’t file jointly if you aren’t married, no matter what else you set up

      Not true. We filed jointly for years as common law. 🇨🇦

  • Kommeavsted@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Socially it’s an excuse to party with everyone you love.

    Legally it’s only worth it if you have kids, plan to migrate countries, or have shitty immediate family among other things. But if you’re just in a long term relationship with your finances otherwise separated, no kids or end of life concerns, then it can be somewhat detrimental as you’re just inviting the state in to meddle with your life.

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      This is a shallow and very “I just think about the next few hours” view…

      First of all, there are a lot more legal protections to married couples even if no kids are involved. Second, I guess you know when you are going to die so you can be certain there won’t be any end of life concerns, you are certainly immune to accidents, right? But also, you don’t have to be about to die to want your fiance to be allowed in the hospital room with you (which they won’t be if you are unable to provide approval and they are not legally your partner)

      The “state” does not meddle in married life either… this is a rednecky thing to say… unless of course you are referring to treating your partner like crap or attempting to deny them any protection they are legally entitled to